RT @dockaurG: 1/ New Covid Pre-print: Stanford Prof Ionnnidis et al🇺🇸🇨🇦🇮🇹 31 seroprevalence studies in pre-vac era Age Infection S…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
@VarcislavZ @J_Pospieszalski @GregZabrisky Long Covid. Jakie markery wskazują, że ktoś na to choruje? Czym się różni od Long Vaccine? Co do IFR, to pierwsze badania były już dawno, gdy trwała największa panika i ogłupianie społeczeństwa. https://t.co/t4FM
RT @rrkinter: @Debunk_the_Funk A very mild and easily manageable disease. "The median IFR was: 0.0003% at 0-19 years 0.003% at 20-29 years…
@Debunk_the_Funk A very mild and easily manageable disease. "The median IFR was: 0.0003% at 0-19 years 0.003% at 20-29 years 0.011% at 30-39 years 0.035% at 40-49 years 0.129% at 50-59 years 0.501% at 60-69 years" https://t.co/KS36Mtf2Kt
RT @JjinUk64: @PGard0191 @AirborneAware It's far less than 1%. The median IFR of Covid is only 0.035%. And the median IFR for anyone unde…
@PGard0191 @AirborneAware It's far less than 1%. The median IFR of Covid is only 0.035%. And the median IFR for anyone under 60 is just insanely low. 0.0003% for ages 0-19 years 0.003% for ages 20-29 years 0.011% for ages 30-39 years, etc. https://t
RT @BiologasI: Pre-print de un trabajo de John Ioannidis 2022 En 31 estudios nacionales de seroprevalencia en la era pre- vacunación, la m…
@dragonfishy @cafelockedout @joerogan @rustyrockets @chrismartenson He amongst a few others showed me I was not alone seeing through the madness that will always be remembered as the time government over stepped control in the name of a virus with an IFRs
@ScientistBlood @TheEvilRabbbit Also not sure where the 2.5% comes from, John Ioannidis put it at about .5% on 2022 for ages 60-69, unvaccinated. https://t.co/AZawPqKo2K
@CollignonPeter The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was ALWAYS comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whos
@CMQ_org https://t.co/Swo4B6RHcP ILS VOUS ONT VAXCINGLER POUR UN TAUX DE MORTALITÉ DU COCO VIDE DE MÊME PAS 1 %
@CMQ_org https://t.co/Swo4B6RHcP ILS VOUS ONT VAXCINGLER POUR UN TAUX DE MORTALITÉ DU COCO VIDE DE MÊME PAS 1 %
RT @Carborundu55651: @alexandrosM https://t.co/JpTUPeLGBw "The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-3…
RT @Carborundu55651: @alexandrosM https://t.co/JpTUPeLGBw "The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-3…
RT @IkNet: @mkeulemans @DrZemouri Ongevraagd het mrna prikje tegen covid in het RVP programma willen stoppen terwijl kinderen tot 19 jaar…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @IkNet: @mkeulemans @DrZemouri Ongevraagd het mrna prikje tegen covid in het RVP programma willen stoppen terwijl kinderen tot 19 jaar…
@mkeulemans @DrZemouri Ongevraagd het mrna prikje tegen covid in het RVP programma willen stoppen terwijl kinderen tot 19 jaar een IFR hebben van 0,003 ; dat helpt voor het vertrouwen👎 https://t.co/kkYixWFOwF
@ProfTimNoakes The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whose benefi
@BenIrvineAuthor Yes and this research shows just how mild. We already knew this was likely from extrapolation done by prof. John Ioannides in 2020. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@ShepherdWales @JuliaHB1 @FlorenceWoodle1 No it never changed, the IFR never got above 0.1% https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@YouAreLobbyLud What poppycock, your guesses have been shown incorrect. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@Inquiry_Canada What so few know (because they don't want you to) - this is how the Human Immune System handled C19 in 2020 ... BEFORE the jabs. (From study by Stanford's Prof John Iaonnidis, one of the world's most cited scientists - https://t.co/HOJBvwJ
@AnnaLouiseMR @PrifWeinidog Herd immunity was always the correct response, just a shame we didn't follow through with it and did so much damage to the country, the economy and not least our children with pointless lockdowns. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@gwladwr @PJeffcock We all have been, with a virus that has an IFR of 0.01% so not a problem. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@dee41ca @CTVNews SCIENCE not Political science The median IFR (for Covid 19) was 0.0003% at 0-19 years 🤡 https://t.co/CenmP981ep
@StefSimanowitz @BorisJohnson If it was novel it would have ravaged through China and Africa, however it was a flu seasonal virus, slightly more virulent after previously mild years. It was the nocebo due to the media’s hysterical propaganda and had no hig
@carolvorders @StefSimanowitz Covid was a economic restructuring that fooled the Left. If it were novel it would have ravaged through China and Africa, however it was seasonal flu. The media’s hysterical propaganda created a nocebo affect but pre vaccine m
@Ben_L_Tracey @SenWarren @SenMarkey If it was novel it would have ravaged through China and Africa, however it was a flu seasonal virus, slightly more virulent after previously mild years. It was the nocebo due to the media’s hysterical propaganda and had
@greg_travis @redcelt2 Yes, we've known since '20 older mortality was orders of mag more than younger. Ex: "0.501% at 60-69" aligns well with your 0.4% total pop(https://t.co/TnL751rctc). You started this thread about the 18y-44y group & I've supplied
@greg_travis @redcelt2 CFR is meaningless without the denominator. Covid IFR 30-39 ~0.011%, & 40-49 ~0.035% (https://t.co/TnL751rctc) Cholera untreated ~25%-50%, treated <1%, ~1%>>0.011% or 0.035% (https://t.co/J17KEx4FO6) Polio is effectivel
RT @IkNet: IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/k…
RT @IkNet: IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/k…
RT @IkNet: IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/k…
RT @IkNet: IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/k…
RT @IkNet: IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/k…
IFR (aantal geïnfecteerde mensen dat overlijdt). Niet 3.4% zoals Tedros van WHO beweerde maar vele malen lager. https://t.co/kkYixWFOwF https://t.co/G5K3racwgn
@LawrenceLiKaiSo @BlackLabelAdvsr Here buddy..” The IFRs had a median of 0.035% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013 - 0.056%) for the 0-59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036 - 0.125%,) for the 0-69 years old. ” hope this helps! https://t.co/2iqn2zpoJ
@Ordinary51 @NurseIngrid2 You and I are on different planes of reality. The harms done by protocals are immeasurable. Natural immunity exists. You guys flipped your lids. Turns out it was even less deadly than we were told. https://t.co/uxMItlVwBh
RT @IkNet: @DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. D…
@doctorofinfo @KangaDMC @WokeVirtueSignl @skepticalraptor https://t.co/uxMItlVwBh I had a bug. I have immunity and was in even less danger than we were originally told, so... yeah. No gottcha from you. Long-term side effects are a thing. I'll stay in the
@doritmi @gorskon Covid was nowhere near as harmful as these vaccine sycophants made it out to be. The study was led by Dr. John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at Stanford University; https://t.co/t0IqXU6lG9
@Mike30495986 @LewDrakePhD @rachjewiss I'm dead several times over. https://t.co/uxMItlVwBh
RT @IkNet: @DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. D…
Serieus 😱 https://t.co/JFmOfvlHZr
RT @IkNet: @DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. D…
RT @IkNet: @DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. D…
RT @IkNet: @DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. D…
@DrZemouri 99.8 % sterft niet aan corona. Het vaccin kán de onverklaarbare oversterfte nog verklaren; de studies lopen nog. Dus beetje voorbarig dit. https://t.co/kkYixWFOwF
@drostfrank @dancalegria @mkeulemans Hier 7 mensen geen vaccin genomen. Waren twee kwetsbaren erbij. Die waren overigens het eerst genezen toen we allemaal corona kregen. Iedereen binnen 4 dagen opgeknapt. 99,8 % sterft namelijk niet aan corona. Tja. Wet
@blaircowan1 @bbarker48961338 @ryangerritsen https://t.co/uxMItlVwBh The risk of dying was less than we were told originally. I had a bug in March 2020. I sent blood to a lab in a clinical trial. It came back that it was likely Delta. The efficacy of your
@MerlinTomkins @JMCDelingpole There's no evidence it save any lives for a virus with an IFR of 0.03% pre-vaccination rollout in 2020, keep up the myopic virtue signalling. Go and fight in Ukraine if you care so much. 🤡https://t.co/Pb6P4A9bSo
@ClareCraigPath By increasing the baseline it shows there was no pandemic and the people who died were those in care homes. 1. https://t.co/fvPEeAXz39 2. https://t.co/W0eK43gYAO https://t.co/0vgyiYzDah
@Silje_Schevig @HKilset @HaraldRodney @PSteigan @Nettavisen @tv2nyheter @Dagsavisen @dagbladet @dagsnytt18 @KK_Debatt @erna_solberg Nettopp. Jeg er uvaksinert, kjenner ikke en eneste uvaksinert som er død av covid. Kan @HKilset vise til dødstall statistikk
@sadams_s @caz_sampson @rayner_susannah @EmergMedDr What unmitigated bollocks are you spreading like slurry, Steve? It's 2024 not the dark days of mass censorship c. 2020-2022. We all know the C-19 morbidity and mortality numbers were fraudulent, just l
@simonateba The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whose benefit? http
@CKellyUAP The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whose benefit? https
@CalvertJayne @CKellyUAP The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whose
@Davejones0305 @TheGhostSleepi1 Re Stanford Prof Ioannidis study: “For those aged 0-69, which covers 94% of the global population, the infection fatality rate was 0.095%, meaning the survival rate for those infected with covid pre-vaccination for nearly 7.
@0_earthling2 @SkyNewsAust That is a lie. https://t.co/nuLmZDMjaF
The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was comparable to that of influenza. Yet campaigns of fear and propaganda were used to lockdown the world, mandate experimental mRNA injections and push global agendas for control. For whose benefit? https://t.co/q
@MikeKrumrei The danger from the disease itself varies immensely by ago, being nearly null among children and young adults. https://t.co/XDutleaQXV
RT @dancalegria: @mkeulemans Complete nonsens. Lees de literatuur nu toch eens. https://t.co/ND7OYz38Tq het artikel dat je aanhaalt is gesc…
@jeffcliff1 @barbout @hishertheythem @NightShiftMD @tiltherapture Here’s the infection survival rates: https://t.co/Z1WHnfF39I And as far as lockdowns- the societal harms caused- I invite anyone to look at Dr Kaur’s X account. There’s a multitude of studie
RT @JorJorWell: @WallStreetSilv Meanwhile, this is how their immune systems handled the virus in 2020, BEFORE the vaccines. (IFR reversed,…
@oddysseass IFR is laag. https://t.co/1TqTH7sKIm
RT @JorJorWell: @WallStreetSilv Meanwhile, this is how their immune systems handled the virus in 2020, BEFORE the vaccines. (IFR reversed,…
@WallStreetSilv Meanwhile, this is how their immune systems handled the virus in 2020, BEFORE the vaccines. (IFR reversed, from Prof Iaonnidis study here: https://t.co/HOJBvwK3lD) https://t.co/Q7EXrwAaM6
RT @MISSXBUTTERFLYX: FOR MOST! 💥 covid had a survival rate the same as you driving to work this morning 💥 https://t.co/aoSFjVR6SN
FOR MOST! 💥 covid had a survival rate the same as you driving to work this morning 💥 https://t.co/aoSFjVR6SN
RT @DrJBhattacharya: Ioannidis team preprint on covid infection fatality rate pre-vaccine: "The IFRs had a median of 0.035% for the 0-59 ye…
RT @Immetjes: @MeesterEddy @hansvantelling @mkeulemans @anp @parool @NUnl @WNLVandaag Ik ga niet een hele modelling studie door nemen. Die…
RT @Immetjes: @MeesterEddy @hansvantelling @mkeulemans @anp @parool @NUnl @WNLVandaag Ik ga niet een hele modelling studie door nemen. Die…
@MeesterEddy @hansvantelling @mkeulemans @anp @parool @NUnl @WNLVandaag Ik ga niet een hele modelling studie door nemen. Die zijn gewoon allemaal waardeloos. Als de IFR van C19 voor pre-omicron en pre-vax maar 0.095% was dan is “vaccinatie heeft miljoenen
@Deevoee @Filiecs2 @LBower32390965 @GetSchwifyinere Your source? Because your assertion is that it is 1% means 1 of every hundred people that got COVID in 2020 died FROM COVID not with COVID. That wasn’t even close, it doesn’t cross 1% until age 65 and th
RT @john_bumblebee: Een kans die 148 keer zo hoog is om een myocarditis te krijgen bij de 2e prik. Voor alle prikken is deze kans overigens…
@DocDeezWhat They're not his numbers. https://t.co/uY9BrL4FSY https://t.co/ewllFxi45R
@mcrisparlato I’d suggest no one. https://t.co/tiUpl75rkN
@KLVeritas Oh, no, 20 times more deadly than 0.01% for under 40s? That's a whooping 0.2%! https://t.co/o2k7Yg79Bf
@Alex_on_A14 @LaymansScience @Haddagor @thisisnothappen @xyzfredsmith @BerryTartlet @BreezerGalway @drlabos Like I said, you're an idiot... https://t.co/wUI6gzSQfb
@SoCiencia Vacinas são diferentes: algumas bastante efetivas, como a do sarampo, outras não. Vacinar uma população saudável contra uma doença que não representa nenhum risco não faz sentido. No caso da vacina covid, os riscos são maiores que os benefícios.