@SeivwrightTrudy @clairlemon @Ravarora1 @simonahac IFR is around 0.03% for under 60s.... https://t.co/Pb6P4A9bSo - We were sold one of the biggest lies in human history.
@clairlemon @Ravarora1 @simonahac There's no evidence they "saved millions" of lives, it's all based on suspect modelling for a virus with an IFR of 0.03% for under 60s pre-vaccination roll out. https://t.co/Pb6P4A9bSo
@NohaAboelataMD Your stats (the CDC's) are bullshit. Have some actual, non-politicized data. https://t.co/UW4e8CoBCp
RT @AmericanGirlDS: THEY KNEW, then they tried to force your 15 yr old to get jabbed to play soccer or football. #Myocarditis Age-stratifi…
THEY KNEW, then they tried to force your 15 yr old to get jabbed to play soccer or football. #Myocarditis Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies | medRxiv https:/
Da Fraudemia da pevid19... https://t.co/7SUMkGZslz
RT @I_of_the_raven: @CharSmith81 @newact1969 @govt_corrupt @JennAlmas @immrfabulous So you just think immoral consequences doled out by ove…
RT @ArchaicRevival4: The definitive study by Stanford University's John Ioannidis: Covid’s IFR in 2020 Was Less Than 0.1% for Those Under 7…
RT @plaforscience: Un "error" que en realidad, y siendo conservadores con una letalidad en la población general ~0,1%, es unas 10 veces may…
"*Across 31 systematically identified national seroprevalence studies in the pre-vaccination era, the median infection fatality rate of COVID-19 was estimated to be 0.035% for people aged 0-59 years people and 0.095% for those aged 0-69 years." https://t.c
@McguinThe @mattjcan The vast majority of people absolutely did not need to be vaccinated, with an Infection Fatality Rate of 0.03% for people under 60 years old. It did nothing to stop infection and transmission. It was a massive cash cow exercise $$$. ht
Prof Ioannidis: IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years. IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0-59 and 0-69 year old people. https:/
@ltdallagnol @alvarocamposnat @chloepinheiro Ah. Vc precisa se atualizar sobre a letalidade do virus: Novo estudo do analisando dados de 2020, calculou a taxa de mortalidade do virus no início da pandemia. Valor calculado: 0,034% https://t.co/yMVO9ogZIw
It appears the case-fatality ratio of COVID for people under 60 years of age might have been, in fact, about the same as that of seasonal influenza. Preprint paper, with all the caveats that implies. https://t.co/2UhaCXxJQg
RT @plaforscience: 0,0003% Esas eran las posibilidades de morir de los menores de 20 años, en caso de llegar a infectarse, y SIN VACUNA P…
RT @plaforscience: 0,0003% Esas eran las posibilidades de morir de los menores de 20 años, en caso de llegar a infectarse, y SIN VACUNA P…
@infinitelineso1 @Vex042 @govt_corrupt @immrfabulous They are still recommending boosters to this day,also for children. For an IFR better than the flu for MOST. What are you attempting to say? https://t.co/JqIsK0IDyE
RT @plaforscience: Un "error" que en realidad, y siendo conservadores con una letalidad en la población general ~0,1%, es unas 10 veces may…
@CharSmith81 @newact1969 @govt_corrupt @JennAlmas @immrfabulous So you just think immoral consequences doled out by overreaching authority is ok? You can't see parallels to other discrimination? That efficacy was a joke? They were getting ready to tax the
@Quo_vadis_BRD Die Sterblichkeit ohne Impfung von Ioannidis 2022 zusammengefasst: https://t.co/RBDOC6w5jH https://t.co/0iXrmwb77p
@Borbub123 @edwin_schupp Wissenschaftler um John Ioannidis legten im Oktober 2022 eine Neuberechnung vor u gaben bei Personen, die weder infiziert noch geimpft waren, folgende Sterblichkeitsraten in der Pandemie vor Einführung der COVID-19-Impfung an (sieh
Un "error" que en realidad, y siendo conservadores con una letalidad en la población general ~0,1%, es unas 10 veces mayor, del 10.000% Un seleccionador con 1.100 titulares listos para faltar al campo Con 400 laterales derechos Y otros 400 zurdos https:
@edge_li @colossusPhD @ReSistaKay IFR for covid was ridiculously low. Unless you are already sick. https://t.co/JqIsK0IDyE
@ReSistaKay @colossusPhD Get help. https://t.co/JqIsK0IDyE
@LieveToet @eradesm @JaapYnse IFR was 0.095% voor mensen onder de 69 voor dat de prik campagne begon. https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV
@barlow2021 @alexandrosM @AlexBerenson @DrJBhattacharya 0.2%? For people younger than 69 it is 0.095% and is highly age stratified. https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV
@StephJChild1 @IanCopeland5 good i’m sure you knew that covid has a minuscule IFR and there were no interventions necessary in the first place https://t.co/x6cMx1V6fu https://t.co/WKRzI5elKJ
@mytwocts @Andjac_ @Reezyard "The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years" https://t.co/LC8au3fDkK
@P_J_Buckhaults @jsm2334 @ConservJean @Fred224N @may_flowerpot @DowdEdward Well stated Phil. Q on risk/benefit calc. Agree there r some potentially very serious complications that need to be run down but these r the sorts of things that normally get flush
@HHSGov Mean INFECTION FATALITY RATE IS ZERO FOR THIS AGE GROUP Please STOP 🛑 https://t.co/OyKT99bChC https://t.co/Q3rEcZFdvk
@MyMindFull @norman_pilon @dr_barrett @Censored4sure Viruses exist in nature. 8% of our genome is viral in origin. The kids are safe. It's the senescent immune systems that are at risk. And now, the suppressed immune systems thanks to a synthetic product.
@peter_risselada @fmeeus1 Vaccinatie kan nauwelijks van invloed zijn daar de IFR van hen onder de 69 jaar 0.095% is. (2-2) https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV https://t.co/vzESOClzvY
@Dobedobedoodoo @KahnStephen @SteveDeaceShow And most of those that died were elderly, had other conditions, and would have died if they got any respiratory virus. This shows IFR. I am right. Survival rate is over 99.9% for anyone under 65 https://t.co/
@SolNataMD IFR less than 1% for 0-69years of age. Paper Published Oct 2022. The IFRs had a median of 0.035% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013 - 0.056%) for the 0-59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036 - 0.125%,) for the 0-69 years old. https://t
Pre vax rollout in Dec 2020 the IFR was 0.5% in the +60s, slightly higher in the +70s. https://t.co/fvPEeAXz39 The IFR for the flu is dramatically higher in the +70s. https://t.co/YxuZhPgbPF In 3.5 years I’ve never known anyone to die from Covid but kn
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
Le vens ge vaar lijk https://t.co/Qya8HF0Eid
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: 1/ New Covid Pre-print: Stanford Prof Ionnnidis et al🇺🇸🇨🇦🇮🇹 31 seroprevalence studies in pre-vac era Age Infection S…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
@Christinethequ2 @kevinnbass Because the study is from 2022. https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV https://t.co/4FtNnt1TAT
@FHeijblom @Jeron_in_Spain @MarkWendrich @Debunk_the_Funk Juist het vaccin niet nemen. C19 geeft helemaal geen risico op myocarditis. Zie studie Israel (screenshot conclusie beneden) https://t.co/JE4rR8NhnL Hier over IFR: https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV https
@RichRedVoices @rruetigger @angioarchitekt @Needleinthhay11 @TexasLindsay_ This is not a marathon. This is a supposed 100% safe jab against Covid19, a disease with an IFR of 0.095% for 0-69 years. https://t.co/j02Hq7wsdV Do not downplay this and do not i
@AotearoaVeritas @RCR_NZ @nzdsos Of or with? Did they have contributing co-morbidities? The reality for most of us is that we have a 99% survivability rate. Follow the science. https://t.co/4yA1ZC3zKs
@Rodrat14 @_vangelis_66 @Raisethesteaks9 @bennyjohnson That is highly debatable and anecdotal as well. Age and comorbidities contribute to severe outcomes. Most people have been fine. Focused protection would have maybe been an asset. Almost everyone
@Zero_Long_Covid „The median IFR (for Covid 19) was 0.0003% at 0-19 years“ Studie ioannidis https://t.co/g27nu9sxLt
RT @freelandainou: @Annette_LEXA Ioannidis qui calcule IFR sur la séroprévalence (plus réaliste) a des chiffres encore inférieur L'IFR médi…
RT @freelandainou: @Annette_LEXA Ioannidis qui calcule IFR sur la séroprévalence (plus réaliste) a des chiffres encore inférieur L'IFR médi…
RT @freelandainou: @Annette_LEXA Ioannidis qui calcule IFR sur la séroprévalence (plus réaliste) a des chiffres encore inférieur L'IFR médi…
@winiwini65 @Annette_LEXA La létalité covid est même bien inférieur . Ioannidis en s e basant sur la séroprévalence a des chiffres IFR de 0.0003 % pour les 0.19 ans. En effet bcp de covid non comptabilisé (asymptomatiques, non testés) https://t.co/SznU2t3
@Annette_LEXA Ioannidis qui calcule IFR sur la séroprévalence (plus réaliste) a des chiffres encore inférieur L'IFR médian était de 0,0003 % à 0-19 ans, 0,003 % à 20-29 ans, 0,011 % à 30-39 ans, 0,035 % à 40-49 ans, 0,129 % à 50-59 ans et 0,501 % à 60-69 a
@PaulEvans007 @mariannaspring Nope not things I have chosen to believe. Fact as in the Stanford Study (linked below) by Ioannidis, one of the foremost epidemiologists in the world Read it 👍 https://t.co/JXGfAdFTm5
RT @smartfarts1: @vanpen80yahooca @Glowey2022 @HenriAGS Here are my receipts 😂😂 https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS…
@LiamKav @jakesyma @Macj007C @isabelltemple @doritmi @tickerguy @stuffynz @C19VaxInjured @YouTube @mehdirhasan @RemindMe_OfThis @remindmetweets @WSJ If you are literate and numerate, it is all within this study as just one example. https://t.co/HVWCY83sw
@vanpen80yahooca @Glowey2022 @HenriAGS Here are my receipts 😂😂 https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS Age Infection Survival Rate 0-19 99.9997% 20-29 99.997% 30-39 99.989% 40-49 99.965% 50-59
@JourdanChristo4 @Ken__kaneki33 vos chiffres ne sont pas correct Risque de décès du covid pour les 0-19 ans L'IFR médian était de 0,0003 % (calculé d'après la séroprévalence) . En supposant qu'il y a environ 10 fois plus d'hospitalisation que de décès on
@Clint_ZA @MartinStanek @mpc_xetts @goddeketal you should log off twitter and learn how to read https://t.co/swp1cwRnL9
@businessposthq Has anyone seen a QALY or other equivalent estimate for our c19 spend? And how does that figure compare to spends on other respiratory pathogens with similar IFRs? Prof John Ioannidis https://t.co/bF3EHUznJG
@mclaughlan57 @STVNews What infection are you specifically looking at if it’s sars cov2 then read this https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS
@STVNews You should tell the heath professionals to read this 🙏❤️ https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS Age Infection Survival Rate 0-19 99.9997% 20-29 99.997% 30-39 99.989% 40-49 99.965% 50-59 99.871% 60-69 99.499%
RT @smartfarts1: Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalenc…
@SandraWeeden Let’s now go to covid 19 the top epidemiologist from Stanford John Ioannidis https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS 🤡🌎
Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies | medRxiv https://t.co/c3ysXEC5eS
@Adam_Cann @p_bennison @HackedOffHugh This paper took 3 years to get peer reviewed .. it is now.. they sat on it .. but Ioannides was correct in Apr/May 20.. disgusting . https://t.co/R2DvbbU3hC
RT @DisamistadeB: @pills_ofscience https://t.co/NZPZOysr6B Tassi di Mortalità COVlD (IFR) per i non VACClNATl precedentemente non infettat…
@Sofia00029571 @Pavloskanenas @gerontac https://t.co/Zv0r19idnr ναι τι? Οτνα λεμε πηγη κ στοιχεια εννωουμε Ολα.οχι "δες εκει δες εδω" η παραγραφοι 941α,Βαλε κειμενο τι λεει πως το γραφει, Κ υστερα λινκ. Η θνησιμοτητα του κορονοιου τελικα ηταν κατω απο 0
IFR - Infection Fatality Rate “The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.” https://t.co/DYdiRmGHEd
@DirkvanLinth @chrisklomp @DeborahBloem @Wijnandkogelman @Porcupine666 Dirk Please show the figures if you're stating that influenza has a much higher death rate. Covid IFR is very much age dependent. For some more info see Orwell's timeline. https://t.c
@jonathanstea All based on dodgy model funded by Big Pharma $$$, there's no evidence they "saved" any lives with an IFR (infection fatality rate) of 0.03% and below for under 60s. https://t.co/Pb6P4A9bSo
@franceinfo Faux 256 morts d'après OMS Dashboard semaine du 19 juin, chiffres en baisse. Mort avec covid . https://t.co/vhU0fNt7gw Rappelons la létalité covid Pour les 0-19 ans IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years https://t.co/SznU2t3eyE. Vaccination covid pour
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
@BStulberg @bttnclckr @BioLayne @Cooking_it_Keto That is not age 5-12. The closest I can get to IFR for young people is in an Ioannidis study "The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years" You must have data showing covid vaccines improve that IFR fir that
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…