@JamieSm38117887 Yes lets just forget all the damage caused by government lies surrounding convid!! Lets let them off so they can do it again!! https://t.co/aoSFjVR6SN https://t.co/qODTf6vMSV
https://t.co/kkYixWGmmd (IFR is aantal mensen dat overlijdt na besmetting) The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years. *At a global level,
@caz_sampson @New_Arrival_22 @DrAseemMalhotra @carlheneghan Stanford Prof Ioannidis study: “For those aged 0-69, which covers 94% of the global population, the infection fatality rate was 0.095%, meaning the survival rate for those infected with covid PRE-
@jucilnacional @desdelamoncloa @interiorgob @guardiacivil @policia De esta, tampoco moriremos todos. Sugiero lectura, para que si tenéis próximo mandato de ENCIERRO ILEGAL y ACIENTÍFICO, os pille preparados en matemáticas. "El desconocimiento de las mat
RT @NurembergJudge: 119 individuos necesarios vacunar para que 1 tuviese el beneficio que afirmaba Pfizer según sus condiciones de ensayo (…
119 individuos necesarios vacunar para que 1 tuviese el beneficio que afirmaba Pfizer según sus condiciones de ensayo (PCR +, etc).Considerando que la letalidad del virus no era el 12% que afirmó Simón (Ioannidis et al https://t.co/UheAHPZS56 ), ¿Resultó
@Mssarahmssarah "Median IFR was .0003 for less than 19" https://t.co/Bo3DHt7Fwc Yes, I can read.
@Lightning12_ @Joey7Barton @mattletiss7 So the vaccine was not 100% safe. (What was it? 99%? 98%? 90%? 80% less?) The infection fatality rate of the virus for the unvaccinated (0-59) was 0.03%.(https://t.co/hfcSo3vbPZ) And the vaccine did not stop you gett
@ErtsasMay @Ingeborgborg https://t.co/3J35P8sShK Infectin Fatality Rate was: - 0.0003% at 0-19 years, - 0.003% at 20-29 years, - 0.011% at 30-39 years, - 0.035% at 40-49 years, - 0.129% at 50-59 years, - 0.501% at 60-69 years. I FR may have
@leftistrevolt12 @AusRepNEWS @CKellyUAP Before you start calling folks ignorant. Perhaps do some research. "At a global level, pre-vaccination IFR may have been as low as 0.03% and 0.07% for 0-59 and 0-69 year old people, respectively." https://t.co/cCHp
@Daria65578032 @old_chemist Śmiertelność covid porównywalna że śmiertelnością grypy, 0, 02% https://t.co/mUAyF6kZPq
@Daria65578032 @old_chemist Śmiertelność covid porównywalna że śmiertelnością grypy,dane od profesora Ioannnidis że Stanford University Oszukano cię. https://t.co/mUAyF6kZPq
@smurfsj @kavanagh_judy @RajeevJayadevan You don’t need to live your life in isolation and a respirator for a common respiratory virus that you already have immunity to. The pre vaccination IFR was 0.03% https://t.co/kYCr6VACh6
@MemphyDoo @RaffyFlynnArt Very few deny covid, they are usually the ones who are asymptomatic, however as to it's seriousness the IFR was always below 1% in reality and some of the latest surveys put it at below 0.1% so really not very serious at all on th
@Tom___Scott I think that may be age dependent, some of the latest research has put the IFR for covid at 0.07% for those under 70, early on prof. John Iaonnidis estimated the IFR to be less than 1% after reviewing the Diamond Princess case. https://t.co/df
@elisaperego78 No, it isn't, Italy played this card on the world once before. https://t.co/dfV29Pylia
@eatonhamilton Its really not that lethal for the vast majority of people, most likely has an IFR of 0.07%. https://t.co/dfV29Pylia
@picapiruli @djlange @mmfornos @JeromeAdamsMD IFR Infection Fatality Rate https://t.co/OyKT99ca7a https://t.co/QbHoFq6K3A
@Fuder131 @DavidAl61682532 @DerLustigeBerti @benfire71 @ProfStefanKraus Hier der „immernoch preprint“ aus okt 2022 https://t.co/rSxFxCenpk
@manuelabergerot Nadie por debajo de 70 tenía el más mínimo riesgo, el 75% por ciento de la población. 20-29 0.003% 30-39 0.011% 40-49 0.035% 50-59 0.129% 60-69 0.501% https://t.co/UheAHQ0pUE
@sanidadgob @Monica_Garcia_G Nadie por debajo de 70 tenía el más mínimo riesgo, el 75% por ciento de la población. 20-29 0.003% 30-39 0.011% 40-49 0.035% 50-59 0.129% 60-69 0.501% https://t.co/UheAHPZS56
@Monica_Garcia_G Nadie por debajo de 70 tenía el más mínimo riesgo, el 75% por ciento de la población 20-29 0.003% 30-39 0.011% 40-49 0.035% 50-59 0.129% 60-69 0.501% https://t.co/UheAHPZS56
@Skippy_Bush_Roo @antistupidide @DschlopesIsBack The article states the CDC reported 72,000 kids died from Covid then it had to retract the lie. Here's the Stanford study based on real blood samples, not arbitrary decisions if someone died with or from C
@r_hellqvist @jakobforssmed Pfizers kliniska studie om barn kunde inte visa minskning av antalet allvarliga sjukdomar, men visade en ökning av allvarliga biverkningar inklusive ett barn som är allvarligt handikappat för livet. IFR 0.0003% 0 - 19 år. https:
@EnemyInAState Fear Porn. This is how our immune systems handled the virus in 2020, BEFORE the vaccines. (IFR reversed. Data from study by Stanford's Prof Iaonnidis here -https://t.co/HOJBvwJvw5) https://t.co/q2yFOXyDAC
@1blmoss @FactsAreGood @sjs856 You can read Prof. Ioannidis paper on that matter and please don't feel bad if we don't give a shit what you say about it, but listen to the real experts, ok?😉 https://t.co/wUI6gzSQfb
@FactsAreGood @1blmoss @sjs856 Making them up? Ioannidis you know nothing fool... https://t.co/wUI6gzSQfb
@P_McCulloughMD And how did the Human Immune System handle the virus in 2020 WITHOUT any vaccines? *Infection Fatality Rate reversed, from study by Stanford's Prof. John Iaonnidis: https://t.co/HOJBvwJvw5 https://t.co/JiXCBPh7dR
@HopiNg66966500 And this is how the HUMAN IMMUNE SYSTEM handled the virus in 2020, WITHOUT any vaccines. *From study by Stanford's Prof. John Iaonnidis, one of the world's most cited scientists: https://t.co/HOJBvwJvw5 https://t.co/dw02sfQ4g8
@_Brother_Alpha_ @humanityattackd @LichTamara @elonmusk re: "how dangerous covid-19 is" Here's how the Human Immune System handled the virus in 2020, the year BEFORE the vaccines. *Data from study by Stanford's Prof John Iaonnidis, one of the world's most
RT @BiologasI: Pre-print de un trabajo de John Ioannidis 2022 En 31 estudios nacionales de seroprevalencia en la era pre- vacunación, la m…
@ChristianZach18 Oh the irony in your arrogant ignorance. Covid is far less deadly than the flu for children, significantly less deadly for 20-39 years old, slightly less deadly for those age 40-49, and about the same for people 49-69 years old https://t
@JayPBou @jlkBlackburn J'ai pas encore collé des liens vers la source dans toutes les images que j'affiche mais même si j'affiche la source tu vas te comporter comme une anguille et trouver une manière de maintenir ta posture initiale. On l'a déja vu. http
@LongCovidHell If you're in the older generation (+70) covid does pose something of a risk, for those that are younger the IFR is very low (0.07%) I believe the average age of death with covid (not from) was 82, which is the average life expectancy in the
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Powyższe nie oznacza, że💉nikogo nie uratowały. Jednych mogły uratować a drugich uśmiercić lub spowodować poważne powikła…
RT @NarfGb: Only, if you ignore the mess with the IFR and the basic problem that there was NO excess death in 2020. Thank God he probably d…
#OnVousRepond : pourquoi le sinistre de la santé est-il aussi incompétent ? Pourquoi fait-il la promotion d'injections toxiques ?
RT @revoltes: Le taux de létalité de la COVID entre 0 et 59 ans est de l'ordre de 0,03%. C'est moins que la grippe A de 2009 ! (taux de lé…
@NohaAboelataMD You cannot avoid contracting an airborne disease, luckily this one wasn't very deadly. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@SleepyJim0 It's very unlikely that there wouldn't be a you as the IFR for covid in under 70 year olds is 0.07%. It can be dangerous to some but for the VAST majority lockdowns were far more dangerous. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
@RobertKennedyJr Meanwhile, this is how our immune systems handled the virus in 2020, BEFORE the vaccines: (IFR reversed, from Prof Iaonnidis study here: https://t.co/HOJBvwK3lD) https://t.co/IQMRsacfS2
@crabb_vicki https://t.co/oaz9OBvls3 'Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly informed from pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies' https://t.co/Mat60BJh5w
RT @dancalegria: @mkeulemans Complete nonsens. Lees de literatuur nu toch eens. https://t.co/ND7OYz38Tq het artikel dat je aanhaalt is gesc…
@TorySnyc @Perpetualmaniac @sjs856 . *correction: Mild for the unvaccinated https://t.co/PPrFwLzarq https://t.co/0SqbD5ftfm
RT @JorJorWell: @MartinKulldorff And how did those children's immune systems handle the virus for all of 2020, BEFORE the vaccines? Take a…
RT @JorJorWell: @MartinKulldorff And how did those children's immune systems handle the virus for all of 2020, BEFORE the vaccines? Take a…
RT @JorJorWell: @MartinKulldorff And how did those children's immune systems handle the virus for all of 2020, BEFORE the vaccines? Take a…
@MartinKulldorff And how did those children's immune systems handle the virus for all of 2020, BEFORE the vaccines? Take a look ... *IFR reversed, from study by Prof John Iaonnidis here: https://t.co/HOJBvwK3lD https://t.co/KhzwOTkqq5
@MartinKulldorff Link broken. Try this: https://t.co/HOJBvwK3lD *Going to delete the post and repost with correct link.
@Opinions_Survey @MartinKulldorff Thx. Try this one https://t.co/HOJBvwK3lD
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Powyższe nie oznacza, że💉nikogo nie uratowały. Jednych mogły uratować a drugich uśmiercić lub spowodować poważne powikła…
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Powyższe nie oznacza, że💉nikogo nie uratowały. Jednych mogły uratować a drugich uśmiercić lub spowodować poważne powikła…
RT @PiotrWitczak_: Powyższe nie oznacza, że💉nikogo nie uratowały. Jednych mogły uratować a drugich uśmiercić lub spowodować poważne powikła…
@ContainmentNu @Karl_Lauterbach Karl heeft het buskruit niet uitgevonden. Hij dacht dat arts/ onderzoeker John Ioannidis the great barrington declaration had opgesteld https://t.co/XHC26dM56i
@ZaleskiLuke INFECTION FATALITY RATE https://t.co/OyKT99bChC https://t.co/CI0BJxQUCb
RT @IPiikki: @TommyeAugustin @pbockerman Noista tartuntakuolleisuus luvuista on todella vaikea saada ylikuolleisuutta aikaan. https://t.co/…
@TommyeAugustin @pbockerman Noista tartuntakuolleisuus luvuista on todella vaikea saada ylikuolleisuutta aikaan. https://t.co/GKIomjMZFV https://t.co/PsbiViaByt
@tg128 Μην ξεχάσουμε ποτέ ότι ο δείκτης θνητότητας της λοίμωξης (IFR) προ του εμβολιασμού ήταν ανά ηλικία: 0,0003% σε 0-19 ετών 0,003% σε 20-29 ετών 0,011% σε 30-39 ετών 0,035% σε 40-49 ετών 0,129% σε 50-59 ετών 0,501% σε 60-69 ετών https://t.co/qtN
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
@SusieFlintham @MichaelRosenYes We took it far too seriously and those in control made a lot of money off that, a disease with an IFR of 0.07% does not need to be taken seriously. https://t.co/dfV29PxNsC
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
RT @JoshWalkos: @JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003%…
@JesslovesMJK She injected her 9 and 11 year olds and then injected them again with the booster’s for a virus with a .0003% IFR for those ages. She is Director of the CDC. Let that sink in. https://t.co/Ldxob8GD3w https://t.co/Ck8Nh3TeoB
RT @dockaurG: Stanford Prof Ioannidis et al Covid pre-vaccination Infection Fatality Rate paper is now peer-reviewed & published. Conclusio…
@CTVNews In 2020, the year BEFORE the vaccines were rolled out, this chart* shows how the human immune system handled COVID. *Infection Fatality Rate reversed from study here by Prof. John Iaonnidis, one of the world's most cited scientists: https://t.co
@mjtimber2 @bramkoers_tweet @jsm2334 0.05% is not unreasonable for a pre-vaccination IFR. It mainly depends on the age of your population. https://t.co/B1dT6O5r9m
@scienceBYchoice @BarryESharp @VikiLovesFACS Pre vaccine numbers are so scary too. Math is hard. IFR is hard. Statistics is hard. https://t.co/4GzFLEgNPh https://t.co/EhrEXHyjsM
@MarionKoopmans Gezonde mensen onder de 60 sterven en stierven nauwelijks aan corona. https://t.co/kkYixWFOwF
@Bavarisi @Zero_Long_Covid @berlinerzeitung @Karl_Lauterbach @c_drosten @hendrikstreeck @BrinkmannLab Das stimmt eben nicht. Genauso wenig ist sich "die Wissenschaft" einig. https://t.co/N5wQJl1JZn Todesrate nach Alter (infection age fatality) vor Impfung.
RT @Buenrolloreturn: Un estudio diciendo que los confinamientos provocaron muertes. ¿No era eso lo que decían los negacionistas?
@PittTweet
@MikeDonio To emphasize the criminality of what they did to us all, Reminder of the IFR's below. The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60
@goingtogetugly @luckytran Nothing fallacious about pointing out your abysmal track record that shows you're unreliable on the topic you discuss, you deceptively leaving out those older than 69 for SARS-CoV-2 but not for influenza, etc. https://t.co/8sbzX
@goingtogetugly @luckytran Also, you're a dishonest, @goingtogetugly. For example, the garbage pre-print you posted leaves out those older than 69 for COVID-19, something you conveniently didn't do for influenza. How deceitful of you. https://t.co/8sbzX
RT @Buenrolloreturn: Un estudio diciendo que los confinamientos provocaron muertes. ¿No era eso lo que decían los negacionistas?
RT @Buenrolloreturn: Un estudio diciendo que los confinamientos provocaron muertes. ¿No era eso lo que decían los negacionistas?