↓ Skip to main content

medRxiv

Article Metrics

Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses [COR…

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
88 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
920 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses [CORSAIR] study)
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957
Authors

Smith, Louise E., Potts, Henry W. W., Amlot, Richard, Fear, Nicola T., Michie, Susan, Rubin, James

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 920 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Psychology 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Unspecified 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1462. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,515
of 16,631,923 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#107
of 15,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344
of 315,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#26
of 835 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,631,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 835 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.