| Title |
Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses [CORSAIR] study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
medRxiv
|
| DOI | 10.1101/2020.09.15.20191957 |
| Authors |
Smith, Louise E, Potts, Henry WW, Amlȏt, Richard, Fear, Nicola T, Michie, Susan, Rubin, G James |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 843 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 340 | 40% |
| United States | 32 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 1% |
| Argentina | 7 | <1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| Ireland | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 6 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 37 | 4% |
| Unknown | 389 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 659 | 78% |
| Scientists | 79 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 75 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1389. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,449
of 24,475,473 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#330
of 45,640 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,475,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.