↓ Skip to main content

medRxiv

A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19
Published in
medRxiv, January 2021
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.11.21249461
Authors

Wilde, Harrison, Mellan, Thomas A, Hawryluk, Iwona, Dennis, John, Denaxas, Spiros, Pagel, Christina, Duncan, Andrew, Bhatt, Samir, Flaxman, Seth, Mateen, Bilal A, Vollmer, Sebastian, Harrison Wilde, Thomas Mellan, Iwona Hawryluk, John M. Dennis, Spiros Denaxas, Christina Pagel, Andrew Duncan, Samir Bhatt, Seth Flaxman, Bilal A Mateen, Sebastian J Vollmer

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 211 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 657. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#30,672
of 24,452,594 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#689
of 45,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,102
of 513,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#6
of 1,201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.