↓ Skip to main content

medRxiv

Article Metrics

A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.11.21249461
Authors

Wilde, Harrison, Mellan, Thomas A, Hawryluk, Iwona, Dennis, John, Denaxas, Spiros, Pagel, Christina, Duncan, Andrew, Bhatt, Samir, Flaxman, Seth, Mateen, Bilal A, Vollmer, Sebastian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 662. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#26,607
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#673
of 38,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,520
of 22,451,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#50
of 14,377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,451,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14,377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.