↓ Skip to main content

medRxiv

Article Metrics

What is this page? Embed badge

A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
217 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Summary News Blogs Policy documents Twitter Research highlights Misc. Dimensions citations
Title
A national retrospective cohort study of mechanical ventilator availability and its association with mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19
Published in
medRxiv, January 2021
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.11.21249461
Authors

Wilde, Harrison, Mellan, Thomas A, Hawryluk, Iwona, Dennis, John, Denaxas, Spiros, Pagel, Christina, Duncan, Andrew, Bhatt, Samir, Flaxman, Seth, Mateen, Bilal A, Vollmer, Sebastian, Harrison Wilde, Thomas Mellan, Iwona Hawryluk, John M. Dennis, Spiros Denaxas, Christina Pagel, Andrew Duncan, Samir Bhatt, Seth Flaxman, Bilal A Mateen, Sebastian J Vollmer

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Mathematics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 663. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#28,722
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#681
of 42,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,080
of 507,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#11
of 1,232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of medRxiv.