↓ Skip to main content

medRxiv

More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,186)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
106 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6259 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions
Title
More than 50 Long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
medRxiv, January 2021
DOI 10.1101/2021.01.27.21250617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Lopez-Leon, Talia Wegman-Ostrosky, Carol Perelman, Rosalinda Sepulveda, Paulina A Rebolledo, Angelica Cuapio, Sonia Villapol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5096. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#816
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#9
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 542,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 196.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 542,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.