@stock_driver_ @bobsimon97 @jordanbpeterson Similar results were found in Ontario. Effectiveness of Moderna + Pfizer mRNA vaccines against omicron < 60d of the second dose is 5.7% then turns negative. It continues its slide to a low of -42% at 180d bef
@arekdougy “Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 37% (95%CI, 19-50%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose.” https://t.co/8Dhx24jB7Y
@semi_i_photo @xgoogoogoox @MEDIUMZA9 @BNODesk >“#1 priority is low prevalence.” Agreed 🤝 >“vaccination…is adequate to…achieve a very low prevalence.” I don’t think this is accurate unfortunately. Esp. w/ variants. e.g., https://t.co/TEj5LS5E8c
RT @blanc0981: あの、２回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が３つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
@AndersonBooz @ctvqp @jkenney 2/ Public Health Ontario: “receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time, and vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120-179 days and -42% 180-239 days after the second dose.
@Kapur_AK @NightShiftMD Then prove it if it's so easy. https://t.co/ZRBvkkT2GT
@chuckgraef @angrybklynmom @ashishkjha That’s factually inaccurate. Not only is vaccination up to 27x less protective than recovery from infection in this area, vaccines didn’t half odds of infection even with Delta (38%)! https://t.co/PN89bKceFS
RT @j_sato: カナダ報告で、武漢株用mRNA💉はオミ株感染予防は逆効果で確定だが、一筋の光も https://t.co/vkSHAROYfs 2回接種者は💉240日以上経過すると、180-239日の人より感染しにくくなる →免疫低下/抗原原罪は8ヶ月で、それを超え…
RT @hironutrition: そうか気づかなかった。 一時的なリンパ球の破壊は避けられないけど、240日経過すると回復するということは、逆転写は起こっていないし、LNPも徐々に減少するということだよね。 もしかして、早めに対処してうまいことやれば最悪の事態は避けられ…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
@josephkrengel @ItsJustAFlu2u @DaliaHasanMD @fordnation Unsure about Dr. Malone, however, Public Health Ontario reports: “2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time, and vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120
@JeffCavanagh1 @mondobondage @JesseBlackAllen Yah your right. My husband's experience is probably just a one off. No evidence or data anywhere to suggest otherwise. The vaxed aren't getting omicron at all. https://t.co/Gk4K9WLTSx
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
@chris_greenwald @stewak2 @nickexperience @gregggonsalves @nytimes These are relevant: Transmissibility study (pre-omicron) https://t.co/5Kx8Odgmio Reinfection study of omicron https://t.co/6hVy7nzFBG
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
RT @PHealthGnome: Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protecti…
Not going to interact with what will likely be a flood of anti-vaxers, but the data is clear that 3+ doses offer protection against Omicron. You can see the rebound in efficacy on the science tables dashboard or in a test negative design study here: https:
@EmmMacfarlane @jtrothwell What matters for the cost-benefit is *how much*. The Canadian study cited suggests the benefit has changed over the course of the pandemic. (source: https://t.co/hl3xSamxwF). Again, mandates may have been a slam dunk policy in 20
Data set - Table 1 - Ontario Christmas - 2021/2022 https://t.co/RQMTfFSJs5
@NadiaMaza53 @NightShiftMD Viruses can mutate around said vaccines in a span of 12 months rendering them obsolete in preventing transmission. Policies must adapt. Ontario Public Health: “2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infec
Given the weak data on VE for stopping Omicron infection, some of which comes from Canadian public health scholars https://t.co/BYgC6ve4II, it seems very hard to justify a vaccine mandate, let alone a major crackdown on liberty & protestors, to prevent
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @VegtDoor: U twijfelt of u zich wel wilt laten #Boosteren tegen #Omicron variant? mRNA “boostervaccin” heeft op z’n hoogst nog maar 37…
@Michael_O_Regan Not to mention the numerous studies that show increased NEGATIVE efficacy in the vaccinated- ie; MORE inclined to contract covid and as the vaccine obliterates your immune system leaves you more susceptible to illness https://t.co/IjxFEm5R
@BennyBrodala @DrDavidNL @annstrikje https://t.co/A7Zlr3SYag ook in Canada, een negatief effect....
RT @TradeFutes: @BoestMode @richardzussman Negative efficacy study, out in Jan 2022 (Canada). Up to -40% negative (ie you are 40% more like…
@BryBrightside @Kenneth33071904 @ParentMishmash @Progressive_RN So I’m shadow banned again? Interesting Here are some of the preprints showing negative efficacy for vaxxed which suggests possible OAS https://t.co/JuP5DzixMN https://t.co/EQBAkiIWKY https
@pedromgamaro @LiberalPT As vacinas não funcionam. O certificado só certifica que foste enganado. https://t.co/2pxYTaLgag
@linksbynature @Normen801 @Frau_Baer @Dr_Emergencydoc 2 will sagen: Die alt-IImpfung hilft nicht gegen Mutanten, da die Antikörper Antigenspezifisch, also nur für das Spike Protein der Impfung sind und nicht für Omikron. Außerdem: https://t.co/hpS3w8lfXd
@observadorpt Estranho. Os estudos mostram que as vacinas são altamente ineficazes. https://t.co/2pxYTaLgag
@MiGalaxyNote @ThomasCyrix @Scilabus @SandozProd @RadisIrradie @gregtabibian @AntoineGoya Si, le vaccin est efficace a 37% contre l'infection https://t.co/z11CiMQMjj. Et il est tres efficace contre l'hospitalisation est élevé surtout avec le bosster http
@Surgeon_General Psst....COVID-19 has some pretty common and pretty severe sequelae. The vaccines do a decent job against acute severe COVID. Not so much w/infections that can lead to long COVID. https://t.co/jDounX15As.
@JohannesBakker7 @BatesLine @grahamctv 3/ Ontario Public Health: “…receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time, and vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120-179 days and -42% 180-239 days after the se
@BoestMode @richardzussman Negative efficacy study, out in Jan 2022 (Canada). Up to -40% negative (ie you are 40% more likely to contract than unvax (mRNA) person). https://t.co/iCsxjGv6NW
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
@imgrund @_scornful_one Thank you for the pre-print link. In the scientific method, we must look at the totality of information, and consider trends displayed by all studies. Individual studies in isolation can present bias. There are many such studies ava
@_scornful_one @imgrund Last pre-print (I promise). Public Health Ontario published similar findings: “2 doses of COVID vaccine was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time & vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120-179 days and -42% 180
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
@imgrund @ShaunHa06087020 Ontario Public Health pre-print: “2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time, and vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120-179 days and -42% 180-239 days after the second dose” https:/
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの３回目接種で34％😭でモデルナは59％で合わせて37％とのこと。さらに、２回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
RT @NathanStall: Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding th…
Given these changes, experts advised #Ontario should either expand or end proof of vaccination requirements. Expanding them would mean requiring 3 vaccine doses, something we know is our best protection against the #Omicron variant. 5/10 https://t.co/pUo
Latest Ontario study on vaccine effectiveness against delta and omicron illustrates clearly why a third dose is necessary. https://t.co/7xvkQTDSC7
@CNN Because the benefits are negligible. It doesn't give enough immunity to stop community spread and 2 doses are enough for most people to avoid bad cases (those at risk risk should consider it though). https://t.co/PZLC2ZcG2a https://t.co/Ff2ZXCkdWq htt
@Sandra55346089 @LordWallrose @dezmac_au @camosnowgirl13 > “when I had covid I was allowed work because I was no threat to anyone” Yes you were. Reinfection https://t.co/j2j1DVYhBf Omicron infects vaccinated people https://t.co/6hVy7nzFBG https://t
@AgentSmithNo2 And here regarding effective of vaccines against Delta and Omicron https://t.co/8ocbzitJUc https://t.co/YepG6Ixrzo
RT @holmenkollin: Die nächste hochwertige Studie (test-negative design, Omicron n=3442) mit negativer VE von mRNA-Impfungen: Infektionssch…
RT @blanc0981: あの、２回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が３つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
@OrwellianNz84 @PowderPuffPlay This one is from Canada https://t.co/zZSYpiDn5y
@schumphster @jrobbins64 @alexjbroad93 @JustinTrudeau These vaccines don't have sufficient efficacy to achieve herd immunity. This is endemic and the lockdowns will never stop the spread, even with 100% compliance of 3rd dose. Lockdowns are not the path fo
@TrollAdopt @fordnation @Justin_Ling 2/ Public Health Ontario: “…receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection at any point in time, and vaccine effectiveness was -38% 120-179 days and -42% 180-239 days after the seco
@colinb099 @JimmyTheGem321 @shanaco @NoTrucks_NoFood Another reason not to Vax if you have a healthy immune system: Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron. Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was only 37% ≥7 days after
@epluribusfreed1 @Victoria4VA Study for above comments: https://t.co/B7f2kjR08Q
@montrealaise2 You can start by getting your science from scientists. Here's a free link: https://t.co/gbqCYFyecc
@dgme_d @Bluize69 @DutchHockeyMom You must be a new Covidiot, the first rule you learn is that you have to hide from data like its the Terminator. https://t.co/cjr4NLtzLA https://t.co/FvtwHFoRFy https://t.co/eRlmwIbAkY
@jennydjld2019 @jshires65 @JonathonHagloff @gaetano1piccir1 @TheoFleury14 Simple, sure. But wrong, unfortunately. https://t.co/PTPCrK44D1 https://t.co/8qb18pXWIZ
RT @TijlDeBie: Andere studies, voor Omicron *kort na booster*: Ontario 61% https://t.co/klwovdgKBr US Veterans 62% VE https://t.co/WPfRRK…
Andere studies, voor Omicron *kort na booster*: Ontario 61% https://t.co/klwovdgKBr US Veterans 62% VE https://t.co/WPfRRKJna1 Southern California 68% https://t.co/ujljfnaLC1 Denemarken 55% https://t.co/cHsip4O9DB UK >3 maanden na booster 40-50% ht
@PaulRoundy1 @CBotchis @thedebralea @townerman1 It looks like efficacy against infection for omicron is closer to 37% https://t.co/6Xb3gSY4yL
@Damian_Borrelli @redelkel @globeandmail ->https://t.co/Ff2ZXCkdWq And effectiveness (measured in hospitalizations) wanes more significantly than previously expected (within four months). These unfolding findings have led me to believe the goal of herd
@IrfanDhalla The vax doesn't vaccinate. At best 37% effective against omicron and wanes over time. Not worth the risk of side effects for children. https://t.co/u2TaIhpyte
@VPrasadMDMPH I believe you cited this paper on your substack previously. They’ve updated their figures but continue to show negative efficacy against Omicron. Reductions in severe illness have massive confidence intervals. https://t.co/xWetusEtTl
RT @blanc0981: あの、２回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が３つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @C444Coco: 論文増えたの？ 査読済みになるまで認めへんらしいですよー。
@Tweetycos22 @Kaetterle Werden wie sehen. Den omikron-angepassten Impfstoff gibt's jedenfalls schon. Und wenn der 97% Schutz vor symptomatischer Infektion mit omikron bietet, wie der Wildtyp-Impfstoff gegen Delta, dann sollte mir das erstmal reichen. https
@MaxSchwemer @larsweisbrod Blödsinn. Gegen Infektion mit Delta schützt der Booster zu 97%, Beim Wildtyp selbst wahrscheinlich nahe 100%. Bei omikron wird das mit dem angepassten Impfstoff ähnlich sein. Wer sich bis dahin unbedingt infizieren möchte, ist se
@Bettina74521835 @erik_fluegge Hier eine Untersuchung für Delta und Omicron mit zweiter und dritter Dosis. Es gibt keine seriösen Studien, die Ihre Sicht unterstützen. https://t.co/y4NroeIEkV https://t.co/6XwpLy0Ms5
@kazuchancocone この辺は、私は良く分かりません。 https://t.co/9dbjTG7aCi 統計とかもどういう人たちを対象としているか？とか、色々な点を注意しないと勘違いしやすいですし。 私は良く知りたい場合は論文でツイッターとかの検索をして、色々な人の解釈を比べたりします。
RT @mt9jyo: @KDystopia "テレビは詐欺"を大いに利用します。知り合いにこのワンセットを送信。 ■動画 ▼実数4人詐欺 https://t.co/LpMexHZZw0 ▼ウイルス量に有意差なし(画像) https://t.co/i3zmqn2nI2…
RT @_JSLEE: @SukunaBikona7 @TM_Quencher ワクチンパスポートが無意味どころか有害だという考察にもなりますね。 ただそれだと↓の期間による違いを説明できない。 https://t.co/huiRRjmIim
>カナダ政府が緊急発表「オミクロンはワクチン未接種より2回の方が重症化している。早急に3回目を」 ？？ 原文が変わった？ https://t.co/zXua6r8x2r
RT @siso_sisoon: #memo 周りでブースターラッシュが始まってきたので、とりあえず希望を持ちたい。（義両親、首に原因不明の大きなできもの、腕にアザ、と肌トラブル…あくまで原因不明）
@Dr_Contrefake @EricMassaud @LCI @EliMartichoux lol. Etude pas du bla bla: Conclusions Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less
@Doggg2011 @OnlineSailor @ConsumerSOS @globalnewsto @GlobalNational It's a "novel" virus - humans haven't experienced it b4, hence the science is evolving with new info. Viruses replicate exponentially, while everything we do is linear as we didn't go for
💉後の体調不良（免疫低下/抗原原罪）は8ヶ月を超えると人体が修復開始…🦌先生も自己免疫力は復活してくると言ってたな🙂