RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: @SHIMOMURATakuji @grapewinecat カナダ ケースウエスタンリザーブ大学 プレ論文 https://t.co/q4WgpBVlfG カナダオンタリオにおける研究プレ論文 https://t.co/QNFFyU8…
RT @j_sato: @katsuo46 人体は優秀なので次を打たなければ8ヶ月ぐらいで元に戻してくれそうです。高接種国の超過死亡も8-9ヶ月ぐらいで減って元に戻りそうです。 https://t.co/k2bsdUuk8r
@YanezPeter @matt7gh @RisatoNicola @SecchiLuigi E dopo questa figura di merda DIMOSTRAMI che i vaccinati NON trasmettevano il virus come ci era stato detto pur NON essendoci stati studi. https://t.co/ucvglj8X5B
@DOCTORWHO71 @matt7gh Poi abbiamo anche questo https://t.co/ucvglj8X5B
@BunchoAndPuncho @apoc1999 Erstens reden wir hier von gar keiner echten Impfung, sondern von einem Genexperiment. Es gibt jede Menge Studien, dass die Impfeffektivität negativ ist. Diese z.B.: https://t.co/5yR4C6sUy3
RT @LucasLealMontes: Enlace 39: https://t.co/ejOsvch8V1 Enlace 40: https://t.co/c4Ro9oQmQk https://t.co/if0jc5ADE5
RT @LucasLealMontes: Enlace 39: https://t.co/ejOsvch8V1 Enlace 40: https://t.co/c4Ro9oQmQk https://t.co/if0jc5ADE5
Enlace 39: https://t.co/ejOsvch8V1 Enlace 40: https://t.co/c4Ro9oQmQk https://t.co/if0jc5ADE5
@ETJY @sjs856 "VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was only 36% (95%CI, 24-45%) 7-59 days after a second dose and provided no protection after ≥180 days, but increased to 61% (95%CI, 56-65%) ≥7 days after a third dose." https://t.co/x2lR0e8IkP
@DrNathanCole Studie1: https://t.co/tKP3kI8mY2 >887,193 Kinder >Omicron Effektivität geht unter 0 >Ungeimpfte bekommen seltener Covid nach 4-5 Monaten Studie2: https://t.co/XBXY7XGTEX Selbes Ergebnis. Anfangsimmunität ist super. Nach 3 Monaten si
→事になる(笑)。 実際、コロナに何度も感染した実例があり、回を増すごとに重症化(後遺症を含む)したという話も聞くので、ワク接種が無難という事に変わりない上、SARSの時に物凄く恐怖したADEの正体って意外と単純で、その対処がSARSで成された話を聞かないのも事実w。 https://t.co/OlmfuC6q3y
RT @MakingC19Waves: カナダのオンタリオ州で、予防効果はオミクロン株に2回接種後60日以降マイナスになります。 https://t.co/fqG9iazwBS https://t.co/0AohLB0nkb
RT @MakingC19Waves: カナダのオンタリオ州で、予防効果はオミクロン株に2回接種後60日以降マイナスになります。 https://t.co/fqG9iazwBS https://t.co/0AohLB0nkb
@KevinS55978750 @elemenohpeeisme @Noellenarwhal Yes anything should be measured such as that even vs Omi, vaccines reduce the severity of Covid in the majority. That reduces hospitalizations and needed to be considered in the review and implementation. Man
@Chale333 @VoicesOfVaers @5642780a @ScottAdamsSays Yah man, it’s true and easily verifiable if you don’t consider being force fed propaganda as the only option to gain information. https://t.co/2mjRlPw4UE
@MatthiasSef @GGIund2G Ist lange bekannt https://t.co/2F6y8zy9Db
@TaraBull808 I’m sorry but even a super pro vaccine country like Canada is putting out really damning studies. The denial is scary. I guess that’s “their truth”. https://t.co/ITdQnZkthX
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @gigafurea7: @Rararan1951 ワクチン接種後8ヶ月経てばワクチンの影響力はなくなるから他の人への影響は全くないので安心して欲しい。 https://t.co/CS4zyJfvbB
RT @j_sato: カナダ報告で、武漢株用mRNA💉はオミ株感染予防は逆効果で確定だが、一筋の光も https://t.co/vkSHAROYfs 2回接種者は💉240日以上経過すると、180-239日の人より感染しにくくなる →免疫低下/抗原原罪は8ヶ月で、それを超え…
WELL DONE PROFESSOR! That is one comprehensive list of vaccine failure studies. Democrats, Progressives and Socialist, remember to get your booster shots.
RT @JesseBlackAllen: @AlexBerenson This reminds me. Back in January 2022, a preprint in Ontario came out showing negative vaccine efficac…
@AlexBerenson This reminds me. Back in January 2022, a preprint in Ontario came out showing negative vaccine efficacy (VE). There was a big social media storm over it. The authors later reassessed the data and found no negative VE. https://t.co/izpIQM2
@plus_eins_plus @macmark_de @DrPuerner @BMG_Bund Ich lese sie auch. Und es ist weitgehend akzeptiert, dass 1) Booster nur kurzfristigen Schutz bieten und 2) Ständiges Boostern das Immunsystem langfristig schwächt. https://t.co/seUltXkZPo
@DiegoGrassi11 @il_pat @EmmaKump @LaBombetta76 @marco_borrano @Arcimboldo10 @DrPaoloMezzana @BadMedic @Yosemitebaffo Si basa su una ricerca in preprint, allora vale anche questa https://t.co/8ArTVIywug
@DiegoGrassi11 @il_pat @EmmaKump @LaBombetta76 @marco_borrano @Arcimboldo10 @DrPaoloMezzana @BadMedic @Yosemitebaffo In realtà ne esistono in preprint https://t.co/8ArTVIQ7SQ
@DiegoGrassi11 @EmmaKump @marco_borrano @il_pat @Arcimboldo10 @DrPaoloMezzana @BadMedic @LaBombetta76 @Yosemitebaffo La Ve negativa si è vista con Omicron negli individui con solo 2 dosi superati i 60 gg, come causa si "ipotizza" differenza di "modelli com
Yet we use it to determine whether you can attend a conference or not, even though it was almost 2 years ago. @kenjaques @DrJBhattacharya @VPrasadMDMPH @DrSuneelDhand https://t.co/omZQyn0rei https://t.co/s1mmVjQiwO
@dmndeyes @Jeres_News @WinnieGemmer @carlquintanilla @elonmusk 2) immunity lowered in covid vaxxed https://t.co/LOxXI6ZOIt https://t.co/PFAbikUDvV Vaccine provided no protection against infection at any time (omicron study) https://t.co/z9Um6Nsy2x Oh a
RT @NicoVedrines: Exemple concret de cherry picking Preprint avec efficacité négative / risque d’infection (asympto et sympto +++) Publi…
RT @NicoVedrines: Exemple concret de cherry picking Preprint avec efficacité négative / risque d’infection (asympto et sympto +++) Publi…
RT @NicoVedrines: Exemple concret de cherry picking Preprint avec efficacité négative / risque d’infection (asympto et sympto +++) Publi…
Exemple concret de cherry picking Preprint avec efficacité négative / risque d’infection (asympto et sympto +++) Publication finale sur Covid symptomatique qui montre un bilan moins négatif… https://t.co/XRA1hAfCIv https://t.co/vBOMeblW8U
武漢株型mRNAワクチンの未接種者への新規接種即禁止しないのは学術的にナンセンス https://t.co/FG1wYY8r5P オミクロンに効かないのではなく単にオミクロン感染を増強させている。 要するにリスクだけでノーベネフィット。(爆wwwwwwwwwwww
@AlbertoContri @giusbrindisi preprint: https://t.co/t5Dnduhdhq print: https://t.co/l8UDJbN12a
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @DevaBrahma: mRNAヴァクシーンを2回接種してしまった方々、希望を捨てないで! 3回目以降は、絶対に接種してはなりません!
@RogerSeheult @EthicalSkeptic @h_robbins @mijworth Are you surprised yet? We saw this as far back as January 2022, at least. WHICH, as you recall, it was one preprint out of Israel that led to PH messaging, world-wide, of efficacy re: infection. http
@InfoRgk @TheTriexy @reine_neugier https://t.co/hOkYCBXDkf https://t.co/qpRD5R2BM9 https://t.co/y0hrWTGa39 Und ich hoffe ihnen ist bewusst, was negative Effektivität bedeutet
RT @songwriterakira: 役に立たないワクチンに、国民の血税をつぎ込まないでほしい。税金の無駄遣いです。しかも、海外では若者や子供達が接種で命を落としている危険なワクチンを、これ以上国民に勧めないでいただきたい。残ったワクチンは厚労省・デジタル庁・政治家の皆さん…
@MEUNIERPatric11 @france2000Mars @tristanmf Par exemple cet article canadien https://t.co/9oNXYSowIP De la même manière, on observe ces données dans tous les pays du monde, dans tous types de recherches, et ce peu importe le vaccin évalué.
"No significant protection against Omicron infection beyond 31 days after the second dose of BNT162b2, with significant negative VE estimates 91-150 days after the second dose. We also observed a pattern of non-existent, or even negative VE in Ontario" htt
@julesyugo @msannierose @JamieSale Another study showing clear negative efficacy, yet the authors again claim is cause the vaxxed are engaged in "riskier behavior" and they still support the vaxx! https://t.co/Ik5sT95FAD
@sledilnik @KayaTokuhisa @ana_hocevar Te 2 sta se posebaj zanimivi. Primerjajo delto in omikron. Danska in Kanadska. https://t.co/pmCMqmfrnw https://t.co/N6tcOhd14c https://t.co/dB4YYkSj4J
@breel_m @Acermendax Tiens, un peu de lecture autre que France Soir et Christian Peronne : https://t.co/4GzPoSs02t Efficacité : 37% contre Omicron, 61% après 3 doses. Sur une pandémie, quand la propagation est exponentiel, c'est une différence énorme et p
RT @picphysicians: Did you know a new Canadian preprint study found receipt of 2 doses of #COVID19 vaccines was not protective against Omic…
@pchalouni @4SnowballEffect @tristanmf Les études sont normalement toujours en comparaison entre vaccinés et non vaccinés. J'ai trouvé ça https://t.co/x8Fz1ZHoXL Mais je vais en chercher d'autres demain. Là je dois aller dormir.
RT @picphysicians: Did you know a new Canadian preprint study found receipt of 2 doses of #COVID19 vaccines was not protective against Omic…
RT @picphysicians: Did you know a new Canadian preprint study found receipt of 2 doses of #COVID19 vaccines was not protective against Omic…
Did you know a new Canadian preprint study found receipt of 2 doses of #COVID19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron infection & efficacy was only 37% 7 days after the 3rd dose?https://t.co/MB1YlpVqO2 Join:https://t.co/tieJwP9PYp #coronavirus
@pi_tres14 @deivis_cotelo @PComentator @Dictatriz Tu táctica del despiste consiste en decir que en la 2ª versión del estudio se ha hecho un “estudio de sensibilidad” y en coger material suplementario en el que se describe la evolución de la efectividad en
@pi_tres14 @deivis_cotelo @PComentator @Dictatriz Vuestra táctica es siempre la misma: acusar a los demás de no leerse los estudios (falso), de hacer cherry-picking, q es exactamente lo q vosotros hacéis, o de no entender lo que leen (falso). Todo eso es
@pi_tres14 @deivis_cotelo @PComentator @Dictatriz Es un hilo extenso, salen todas. De las más curiosas (tuit adjunto): pretender que la 2ª versión de un estudio canadiense (no exactamente “versión”, sino nuevo diseño de estudio) ofrece resultados de un pe
@pi_tres14 @deivis_cotelo @PComentator @Dictatriz Aquí tienes un largo hilo de mayo donde pones en práctica todas tus falacias de autoridad y todos los ‘trucos’, ‘triles’ y falacias estadísticas que lleváis utilizando desde hace meses y meses la banda de t
@caz_sampson @beverleyturner @BBCNews @ITV @SkyNews @5_News @Channel4News @GBNEWS Here is another similar study from Canada showing the quick waning of antibodies. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection; Ontario Canada http
@RogerSeheult Relevant to 2022, studies that show that vaccines conducted transmission: https://t.co/IdyerHO0fZ https://t.co/U2Y6hTCLaV https://t.co/QCmmOW8uKZ https://t.co/DvPPyn62A9 https://t.co/mv50ogIfUw https://t.co/PN89bJUDhi https://t.co/4uPq4ehoin
@Sunflowerr306 @brokenthought6 @drdagly Here’s an example. If you feel comfortable playing with fire and dipping below 0% efficacy then by all means proceed. https://t.co/KMTjHuAEar https://t.co/AfX6u4ca7g
@DarkNookShop @slightly_right_ @bkca1418 @jamessmithPT_ Similar results were found in Ontario. Effectiveness of Moderna + Pfizer mRNA vaccines against omicron < 60d of the second dose is 5.7% then turns negative. It continues its slide to a low of -42%
RT @blanc0981: 大人で2回接種後2週間後の二次感染率 未接種者Omi29%Delta28% 2回接種O32%D19% 3回接種O25%D11% オミクロンでは未接種29%よりも2回接種32%の方が家庭内感染のリスクが高い😱 https://t.co/UMgKG0h…
@ToddZywicki @sagusta9 @gadboit and the Canadian study ultimately found VE=1-2% >4-8m+ after 2nd dose once more data accrued. https://t.co/FMvqlK5sD3 Of course in both studies VE was MUCH higher after 3rd dose or after 2nd or 3rd dose for severe diseas
@ToddZywicki @sagusta9 @gadboit The original Danish analysis found -39% (https://t.co/LBpWwSLM7h ) and Canadian (https://t.co/OdwsNAHh23) found -77% for those >6m after 2nd dose ...
RT @VegtDoor: U twijfelt of u zich wel wilt laten #Boosteren tegen #Omicron variant? mRNA “boostervaccin” heeft op z’n hoogst nog maar 37…