@jennydjld2019 @jshires65 @JonathonHagloff @gaetano1piccir1 @TheoFleury14 Simple, sure. But wrong, unfortunately. https://t.co/PTPCrK44D1 https://t.co/8qb18pXWIZ
RT @TijlDeBie: Andere studies, voor Omicron *kort na booster*: Ontario 61% https://t.co/klwovdgKBr US Veterans 62% VE https://t.co/WPfRRK…
Andere studies, voor Omicron *kort na booster*: Ontario 61% https://t.co/klwovdgKBr US Veterans 62% VE https://t.co/WPfRRKJna1 Southern California 68% https://t.co/ujljfnaLC1 Denemarken 55% https://t.co/cHsip4O9DB UK >3 maanden na booster 40-50% ht
@PaulRoundy1 @CBotchis @thedebralea @townerman1 It looks like efficacy against infection for omicron is closer to 37% https://t.co/6Xb3gSY4yL
@gurdaur @Rick84626817 @CityNewsVAN It doesn't work against omnicron though, 37% efficacy after 3rd booster. Hosp packed with vaxxed, but yes let's fire healthcare workers for something that is not working. More lives are being lost due to the mandate than
@SamMorgan19801 @Garafraxa @pmcdunnough He's a sheep, that can't even follow the science anymore that shows the current vaccine doesn't work well against omnicron, meaning mandates are currently useless. But ya keep pissing people off by forcing mandates t
@Damian_Borrelli @redelkel @globeandmail ->https://t.co/Ff2ZXCkdWq And effectiveness (measured in hospitalizations) wanes more significantly than previously expected (within four months). These unfolding findings have led me to believe the goal of herd
@IrfanDhalla The vax doesn't vaccinate. At best 37% effective against omicron and wanes over time. Not worth the risk of side effects for children. https://t.co/u2TaIhpyte
@VPrasadMDMPH I believe you cited this paper on your substack previously. They’ve updated their figures but continue to show negative efficacy against Omicron. Reductions in severe illness have massive confidence intervals. https://t.co/xWetusEtTl
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @C444Coco: 論文増えたの? 査読済みになるまで認めへんらしいですよー。
@Tweetycos22 @Kaetterle Werden wie sehen. Den omikron-angepassten Impfstoff gibt's jedenfalls schon. Und wenn der 97% Schutz vor symptomatischer Infektion mit omikron bietet, wie der Wildtyp-Impfstoff gegen Delta, dann sollte mir das erstmal reichen. https
@MaxSchwemer @larsweisbrod Blödsinn. Gegen Infektion mit Delta schützt der Booster zu 97%, Beim Wildtyp selbst wahrscheinlich nahe 100%. Bei omikron wird das mit dem angepassten Impfstoff ähnlich sein. Wer sich bis dahin unbedingt infizieren möchte, ist se
@Bettina74521835 @erik_fluegge Hier eine Untersuchung für Delta und Omicron mit zweiter und dritter Dosis. Es gibt keine seriösen Studien, die Ihre Sicht unterstützen. https://t.co/y4NroeIEkV https://t.co/6XwpLy0Ms5
@kazuchancocone この辺は、私は良く分かりません。 https://t.co/9dbjTG7aCi 統計とかもどういう人たちを対象としているか?とか、色々な点を注意しないと勘違いしやすいですし。 私は良く知りたい場合は論文でツイッターとかの検索をして、色々な人の解釈を比べたりします。
RT @mt9jyo: @KDystopia "テレビは詐欺"を大いに利用します。知り合いにこのワンセットを送信。 ■動画 ▼実数4人詐欺 https://t.co/LpMexHZZw0 ▼ウイルス量に有意差なし(画像) https://t.co/i3zmqn2nI2…
RT @_JSLEE: @SukunaBikona7 @TM_Quencher ワクチンパスポートが無意味どころか有害だという考察にもなりますね。 ただそれだと↓の期間による違いを説明できない。 https://t.co/huiRRjmIim
>カナダ政府が緊急発表「オミクロンはワクチン未接種より2回の方が重症化している。早急に3回目を」 ?? 原文が変わった? https://t.co/zXua6r8x2r
RT @siso_sisoon: #memo 周りでブースターラッシュが始まってきたので、とりあえず希望を持ちたい。(義両親、首に原因不明の大きなできもの、腕にアザ、と肌トラブル…あくまで原因不明)
@Dr_Contrefake @EricMassaud @LCI @EliMartichoux lol. Etude pas du bla bla: Conclusions Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less
@Doggg2011 @OnlineSailor @ConsumerSOS @globalnewsto @GlobalNational It's a "novel" virus - humans haven't experienced it b4, hence the science is evolving with new info. Viruses replicate exponentially, while everything we do is linear as we didn't go for
💉後の体調不良(免疫低下/抗原原罪)は8ヶ月を超えると人体が修復開始…🦌先生も自己免疫力は復活してくると言ってたな🙂
RT @j_sato: @katsuo46 人体は優秀なので次を打たなければ8ヶ月ぐらいで元に戻してくれそうです。高接種国の超過死亡も8-9ヶ月ぐらいで減って元に戻りそうです。 https://t.co/k2bsdUuk8r
@JonnoL32552677 @DisClothesline @Phoebe_Eden That depends on several factors (which mix of vaccines, how long since the last shot, etc), and on what you're interested in protection against (infection, or severe disease). Here's a study that found a 3rd dos
@spouti2 @Cold_Patron @imgrund @fordnation I'm a huge fan of vaccines, but over hyping their benefit is as dangerous as minimizing it. The reality is that 2 doses are still great at reducing hospitalization but near useless without a booster for reducing
#memo 周りでブースターラッシュが始まってきたので、とりあえず希望を持ちたい。(義両親、首に原因不明の大きなできもの、腕にアザ、と肌トラブル…あくまで原因不明)
@zzz_as_zzz J Satoさんによると、2回目接種後8ヶ月経つと感染防御力が戻ってくるようです。でもブースターを打つとまた振り出しに戻ってしまいますね。https://t.co/tSJigeF11D
@DesbraRon @imgrund @fordnation "VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was only 36% (95%CI, 24-45%) 7-59 days after a second dose and provided no protection after ≥180 days, but increased to 61% (95%CI, 56-65%) ≥7 days after a third dose." https://t.co/
@momto5cats @imgrund @fordnation 2 doses helps with hospitalization for sure, but >180 days after (as most are now) it does nothing to reduce infection without a booster. https://t.co/vmK8X8Tdur
@WCreekerE @RadioFreeTom Here's one. 37% right after getting the second dose, and certainly wanes thereafter. https://t.co/XSmjPodRtP https://t.co/ujuKzcJh1y
@TranLongmoore @Garossino 'We included 3,442 Omicron-positive cases, 9,201 Delta-positive cases, and 471,545 test-negative controls. After 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection declined steadily over time but recovered
@PatriotFirst22 @fordnation You're wrong about that, too. While the vaccine is substantially less protective against Omicron, it still protects against infection about 37%, and you can't pass on a disease you never contract. https://t.co/BZzJkcZtz6.
RT @conjureup: @denmandave @Jamie04042155 @BossNavs @BaystreetBrian Are you willing to get a booster every 60 days? Because a Danish study…
@denmandave @Jamie04042155 @BossNavs @BaystreetBrian Similar results were found in Ontario. Effectiveness of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccine against omicron within 60d of the second dose is 5.7% and is -12.9% afterward. https://t.co/AQxONwIfhX https:
@denmandave @Jamie04042155 @BossNavs @BaystreetBrian Are you willing to get a booster every 60 days? Because a Danish study found that mRNA vaccine effectiveness for both Pfizer + Moderna against omicron drops to single digits after 60d, then turns negati
RT @H13Hanka: @smucler Efektivita je mnohem horší, po 7 dnech na 37% a po měsíci na nule https://t.co/wreKZudp3N
@realreporter @Wanda_WestCoast But the science shows that the vacinne efficacy is down to 37%, so mandates don't work anyway, clearly shown by the mostly vacinnated hospitalizations. https://t.co/j5sAg1hgpZ
@AdrianKerpi @adriandix What is even the point of vaccination when its not working against omnicron, 37% efficacy after 3rd does and hospitals are packed with vaccinated patients: https://t.co/j5sAg1hgpZ
@RhuarcsAiel @Cynthia95001250 @adriandix Latest research on the efficacy of a 3rd dose against omnicron: https://t.co/j5sAg1hgpZ
@Cynthia95001250 @adriandix Science, your not doing much: https://t.co/j5sAg1hgpZ
@adriandix What's the point when the efficacy is only 37% against omnicron? No wonder hospitals are now packed with vaccinated people, but remember how you were blaming the unvaccinated? https://t.co/j5sAg1hgpZ
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
@Takhar77 @Kaur_itihas @JaskaranSandhu_ Conclusions Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less than against Delta. https://t.co/j
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
RT @blanc0981: 『ワクチン打ったほうが未接種より逆に感染しやすい』との結果の デンマークとカナダの論文はそれぞれこれです https://t.co/wrnmyGXhzE https://t.co/MGKEy1PAgC
@3ree6ixty @JustinTrudeau Vaccine is only about 25% effective against Omicron. And Omicron is about a 1/3 as deadly as delta. There is currently no science behind the mandate that makes sense. https://t.co/bf6dftRFkn
@merry123459 @OmgItsDallas @JustinTrudeau What is the effectiveness of the vaccine against Omicron? WHAT IS IT? Why have vaccine mandate if it doesn't work? Answer that question honestly and there is only one solution. No arrests if a useless mandate is
@smucler Efektivita je mnohem horší, po 7 dnech na 37% a po měsíci na nule https://t.co/wreKZudp3N
@BoPrice16 @BobbyJohn987 @crustrader Um... I don't see how no significant effectiveness against Omicron by six months since becoming fully vaccinated could be reasonably described a "incredibly effective by any metric". https://t.co/P2wT4zsvuW
This study confirms the unpublished data observed in Denmark, Scotland, Israel. In Israel, they are starting to see negative efficacy on hospitalisation and mortality unfortunately.
@NORDMWD This is the study he’s talking about in that video. And it shows that the boosters have an effect. So how many Israelis have 2 shots? 3? 4? I guaranteeing not as high as you think. https://t.co/aX6Yy94nzR
RT @PlanetaryIntel: @lovelyropes Und außerdem schützt die Impfung sehr wohl gegen symptomstische Infektion und somit auch Weitergabe. Nur W…
@lovelyropes Und außerdem schützt die Impfung sehr wohl gegen symptomstische Infektion und somit auch Weitergabe. Nur Wildtyp-Impfstoff vs. Omikron halt nicht so gut. Aber 30-60% ⬇️ sind auch nicht NICHTS. ...und bald gibt's ja den angepassten Impfstoff.
@chrilikon @SylK1966 Ach ja? So unterkomplex wie die, die behaupten es gäb KEINEN Fremdschutz durch die Impfung, nur weil der Wildtyp-Impfstoff bei omikron nur noch ca. halb so gut vor Infektion schützt wie gegen den Wildtyp und seine Varianten? https://t
@zafe_zone @SylK1966 @micFDP Es gibt nicht nur schwarz-weiss. Es gibt den Schutz vor Infektion u Weitergabe aber er ist (bei omikron mit dem Wildtyp-Impfstoff) nicht gut genug (30-60%). Daher wird der Impfstoff ja auch angepasst. https://t.co/7oOm0TuLDX
@abc_deck1 @SylK1966 Selbstverständlich. Informieren Sie sich doch mal. Nur weil der Schutz gegen Infektion mit omikron durch den Wildtyp-Impfstoff sehr viel schlechter ist, heißt es doch nicht dass er gar nicht wirkt. (30-60%). Außerdem wird der Impfstof
@Vincent92695247 @SylK1966 @micFDP Bullshit. Selbst gegen omikron noch signifikanter Schutz gegen Infektion. Erst Recht mit neuem Impfstoff ab märz/April. https://t.co/7oOm0TuLDX
@science_in_mind @SylK1966 Wer leugnet hier was? Die Impfung hilft sehr gut auch gegen Ansteckung. Nur der Wildtyp- Impfstoff halt nicht gg Omikron. Deswegen wurde er angepasst, wird bereits produziert u ist mrz/apr erhältlich. Dann wird auch der Schutz vo
RT @LangstrumpfPipo: „Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some prote…
„Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less than against Delta.“ Link zum Preprint: https://t.co/1GXgXq4bZf https://t.co/unLZxa9ny
@MrsCgn @SylK1966 Welche gesicherte Erkenntnis? Die hier? https://t.co/7oOm0TuLDX
@GirkeHanjo @SylK1966 Stimmt nicht. Nach drei Dosen ist auch ein signifikanter Schutz vor Omikron-Infektion gegeben. Nicht gut genug aber auch nicht vernachlässigbar (30 bis 60%) Ausserdem gibt's deshalb ja bald den angepassten Impfstoff. https://t.co/7oO
@TorstenExo @mizzijpx @SylK1966 Wahrscheinlich ähnlich gut wie beim Wildtyp-Impfstoff. Der schützt ja selbst gegen Delta, trotz zahlreicher Mutationen (nach 3 Dosen) noch zu 97% gegen symptomatische Infektion u somit auch fast vollständig gegen Weitergabe.
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
@SylK1966 Ja. Haben Sie falsch verstanden. Der Impfstoff verhindert symptomatische Infektion beim Wildtyp zu fast 100% u somit auch Weitergabe. Bei Delta sind es noch ca. 97% (3 Dosen). Bei Omikron leider weniger. Aber dafür gibts ja bald den angepassten I
RT @KilianKlaiber: Studie aus Ontario Canada. Schützen Covid-Impfungen vor Infektionen mit Omikron? 1. Kein Schutz gegen Omikron 2. Negati…
@Kaptain_spACE @SARSCOVID19INFO @maischberger @SWagenknecht @dieLinke @fdp @DasErste Gerne mal auf´s Konfidenzintervall schauen. Im Lotto und beim Booster ist alles möglich, nicht wahr. https://t.co/AWBmodbgOE https://t.co/ZOJR0QQfDz
@yodameister Boosters still work against omicron https://t.co/aX6Yy94nzR
@Iza03217914 Proszę bardzo 😀 https://t.co/A8n5xpK1Yv
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
@radiofreesalem @jackieohughes @caro_vina @Packerbravefan @EpiEllie And here’s one from the Canadian Immunization Research Network. https://t.co/0OK3XdDX9x https://t.co/vogqUhBR9Z
@RedRebelCanada @LukeDouglas49 @GiveSendGo Oh? This one is about omicron, I can provide more https://t.co/aX6Yy94nzR
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: @SHIMOMURATakuji @grapewinecat カナダ ケースウエスタンリザーブ大学 プレ論文 https://t.co/q4WgpBVlfG カナダオンタリオにおける研究プレ論文 https://t.co/QNFFyU8…
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @blanc0981: あの、2回接種後の方が 未接種より逆にオミクロンに感染しやすいって論文が3つもあるんだけど 理由は何にせよ 憂慮すべき事項でしょ ADEか、接種して気が緩んで、が考えられてるけど https://t.co/vBkHMBHz1P https:/…
RT @mt9jyo: 『VEマイナス者が増える』=『打てば増える』 免疫低下か、ADEか。 一貫して懸念を示されている学者様、少数ですがいますよねー。それをレッテル貼っちゃた人達。 どんだけ無意識に攻撃して、記憶して、指令して、制御してると思ってるのだ。人体をナメないでいた…
@der_subjektive Yes there are explanations. Those are 2 among various studies showing that mRNA vaccination have negative efficiency for symptomatic Omikron infections after more than 60 days after vaccination: https://t.co/NtOJ9HRUi8 https://t.co/bGCvEk
@PaulDechene Vaccine barely slowed the spread at 36 percent efficiency so there is that https://t.co/ah1PicOuQA
@Pablo60518387 @ALCAMO81 @ezikusia @AcebesArias Toma estímulo, Medrxiv 'Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less than against De
RT @field701: @celliottability Hi why are you completely ignoring the data and science and still being a drug pusher? Oh pharma kickbacks..…
@dragonfly_jenny @PremierScottMoe Its not just Moe. It's the waning effectiveness against omincron. Hard to tell someone it works when everyone you know with it is getting sick. https://t.co/PuUelBak4Q
RT @j_sato: @katsuo46 人体は優秀なので次を打たなければ8ヶ月ぐらいで元に戻してくれそうです。高接種国の超過死亡も8-9ヶ月ぐらいで減って元に戻りそうです。 https://t.co/k2bsdUuk8r
@unimib @danielebanfi83 @RobiVil @diMartedi @giovannifloris3 Rispetto agli studi dove viene scritto,nero su bianca, che a distanza di qualche mese si arriva ad avere una efficacia NEGATIVA nelle persone vaccinate, cosa si può rispondere? Studio 1 https://
RT @j_sato: カナダ報告で、武漢株用mRNA💉はオミ株感染予防は逆効果で確定だが、一筋の光も https://t.co/vkSHAROYfs 2回接種者は💉240日以上経過すると、180-239日の人より感染しにくくなる →免疫低下/抗原原罪は8ヶ月で、それを超え…