@dlingenfelter 💩 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depend
@COVID19_disease 💩 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depen
@Debunk_the_Funk TURD 💩 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependi
RT @X_Lord: @munomwnah @PeterSweden7 One Dose: Higher infection rate than the unvaccinated. Two Doses: Higher infection rate than those wit…
@munomwnah @PeterSweden7 One Dose: Higher infection rate than the unvaccinated. Two Doses: Higher infection rate than those with one dose. Three Doses: Higher infection rate than those with two doses. More Doses: Higher infection rate among all groups. ht
RT @Lucky17171717: @JeromeAdamsMD 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously…
@JeromeAdamsMD 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depen
Woher sind Sie sich sicher, dass "die Impfung den Weg aus der #Pandemie gezeigt hat"? 1. Die bekannte Cleveland clinic study zeigte eindeutig, dass die Geimpften öfters infiziert haben: https://t.co/WNJAUIuxBj 2. Schon im Sommer 2021, Israel die meisten I
@Debunk_the_Funk @EricAbbenante Free 💩 TURD 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventin
@toobaffled Fauci knew not just from Day 1 , he knew before Dose dependent reactions , as more as worse https://t.co/7U5jjS0LAt https://t.co/JrGnEERNfd
@Majec_3771 He's incompetent if that's his takeaway. https://t.co/3aOHyv4JTU
@jcsbts @OhMissA1 @DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing
@stevecraig72 @ChrisCuomo 💩 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infect
@PeteAnders81729 @danielgoyal That is not a link to the Study. It is a link to an opnion piece. The study link is here. https://t.co/ynKYzKe7tG Or in graphical form their results were a dose dependent disaster for vaccines as follows... https://t.co/uLXT
@DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@ChrisCuomo @LloydShawMortVt 12/22 Cleveland Clinic 51,011 employees🚨 “Higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending o
@PutrinoLab @ChrisCuomo 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infect
@gardengirl778 @VirusesImmunity @keylas3 @SilvaJ_C @PutrinoLab 🤔 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29%
@PutrinoLab @MountSinaiNYC @MountSinaiRehab @IcahnMountSinai 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29%
@JoePajak @CrabbBrendan @PutrinoLab @ChrisCuomo @NewsNation @1goodtern @BrendanCrabbAC 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent
@CrabbBrendan @PutrinoLab 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infe
@ChrisCuomo 💩 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending
@maolesen 💩12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending on
@elquimicoRic @doctormacias @YouTube Y este otro donde dice que entre más te vacunas más te enfermas. Ya revisado por pares.
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @Lucky17171717: @aftab_usa 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously rec…
RT @Lucky17171717: @aftab_usa 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously rec…
Governments, WHO, and our Science Professionals also ignore investigating people who have multiple vaccinations over a period of years due to suggestions of WHO, the US Government, our corrupt media, and our Politicians, and various piece of shit Hollywoo
@aftab_usa 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending
@UCSFDOM @Rutherford_UCSF @AllisonRBond @PCH_SF @LekshmiMD @Bob_Wachter 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vacci
@Bob_Wachter 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependi
@crabb_vicki @drob256 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infectio
@RyanMarino 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@RyanMarino 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@doritmi @Answers4Sean 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infecti
@doritmi 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending o
RT @egdrennan: A new Cleveland Clinic study concludes that, “consistent with similar findings in many prior studies, a higher number of pri…
RT @egdrennan: 🤔 Is vaccine-induced immunity weaker and less durable than natural immunity?
@TRyanGregory 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depend
6 month study of >50K medical employees found Covid jab effectiveness maxed out at only 29%, and risk of getting Covid "increased with the number of vaccine doses received." https://t.co/ajLlXSpydX
@TRyanGregory 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depend
@7NewsSydney @PaulKadak 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infect
RT @egdrennan: 🤔 Is vaccine-induced immunity weaker and less durable than natural immunity?
RT @egdrennan: 🤔 Is vaccine-induced immunity weaker and less durable than natural immunity?
RT @egdrennan: 🤔 Is vaccine-induced immunity weaker and less durable than natural immunity?
🤔 Is vaccine-induced immunity weaker and less durable than natural immunity?
A new Cleveland Clinic study concludes that, “consistent with similar findings in many prior studies, a higher number of prior vaccine doses was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19." https://t.co/R5bPrIfGQ4
@j_avalonclinic @TRyanGregory 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing
@ZappCheng 講咗九千幾次打得越多，中招機會越大。份報告已經過咗同行評審，都唔記得update添。 https://t.co/UWlAe45J4M https://t.co/fMQr14In6O
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@dawnbazely @TRyanGregory 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infe
@TRyanGregory 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depend
@NohaAboelataMD 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depe
@DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@DrEricDing @emmagf 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection
@DrEricDing @emmagf 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection
@DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@ConlustroR @RandPaul @JesslovesMJK @COVIDSelect @RepMTG @JeffereyJaxen @delbigtree @HouseLyndseyRN @Fynnderella1 @pasiz @Jikkyleaks @CShoemakerMD @MdBreathe 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines pre
@CShoemakerMD 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depend
RT @Kevin_McKernan: @ianfmusgrave @jan_caron @TamaraUgo Modeling nonsense that uses studies that declare the unvaxxed to be 14 days after t…
@Jacquifrench27 @BreezerGalway @Marbles34 The source is the famous Cleveland study and it proves exactly what you see in the graph... More doses, more infections... https://t.co/IcrV3OJWJw
@hmacky7110 @studiocorvo 反ワクって言い方は、かなり失礼なんでやめた方が良いですよ。 真面目に答えると、厚労省のホームページ。 https://t.co/wbxCxbNEQP 接種者の方が陽性率の高くなる表もアドバイザリーボードにあります。 それから研究者が紹介・解説してくれる論文等です。 https://t.co/9C8QKbrIQ1 これなんかは有名 https://t.co/uXzfeReMr5
RT @ciao_fiore: @YahooNewsTopics 🙀打てば打つほど罹り易くなる😱 https://t.co/mJWNdXYwcy 2023/01/19 「週刊新潮の論文」 https://t.co/V66QU4dxVF https://t.co/ghaqFm6…
RT @ciao_fiore: @YahooNewsTopics 🙀打てば打つほど罹り易くなる😱 https://t.co/mJWNdXYwcy 2023/01/19 「週刊新潮の論文」 https://t.co/V66QU4dxVF https://t.co/ghaqFm6…
@YahooNewsTopics 🙀打てば打つほど罹り易くなる😱 https://t.co/mJWNdXYwcy 2023/01/19 「週刊新潮の論文」 https://t.co/V66QU4dxVF https://t.co/ghaqFm6nSy
@BlaylockMooky @Jeff_mc2 @jsm2334 You will just ignore it. Wanna bet? Here are TWO studies showing more covid cases the more vaccinated people are. https://t.co/i9fkdFMwpo https://t.co/TkICz9Z9Yy https://t.co/K1FhHhmlrp
@oldandcray @JeromeAdamsMD 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing inf
@rdmorris 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending
@higgsri @JanciToxDoc @TheChiefNerd excuse me, I suppose I have to add that *INCREASED* infection rates are also supported by data, here https://t.co/CHUfQ4HO6U as well as words from Fauci which the media simply didn't cover https://t.co/5kkNT38vvh
@DinaPomeranz Wie oft gespikt? WIRKLICH massiv unterschätzt werden die vielen negativen Folgen der "Corona-Impfung" genannten #Gentechnik-#Experimente, die spätestens mit der 3. Spikung die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Infektionen durch Schwächung des #Immunsyst
RT @djlange: @flindall_steve Hard pass. https://t.co/3CLbJuE7pz
RT @djlange: @flindall_steve Hard pass. https://t.co/3CLbJuE7pz
@flindall_steve Hard pass. https://t.co/3CLbJuE7pz
@Groovylicious @DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing inf
@DrEricDing 💭 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending
@ArleenBBoyd @DrEricDing 💭 12-19-2022 Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infecti
@LeoNickolls @GBGreatAgain @Richard1255077 @LismynameHp @FreedomReigns2 @JeffreyRumney @DiedSuddenly_ @Drwendspores Booster only 30% effective & omicron infection was 300% likely in vaccinated https://t.co/KHLnxnegvT Yet healthy unvaxed were refused t
@vaitkatar @rosepoptosis @allthetitles @Debunk_the_Funk Those studies are wrong. https://t.co/SRfg5oBSrH