@real3eyedLion @JimFergusonUK In the link above. https://t.co/mv3lmwztda
@JimFergusonUK https://t.co/j3eYudJRO2 This is the study the site refers to but its not the topic proposed? Did it get switched or are the authors if this essay lying?
@_aussie17 ✅Study topic & link. https://t.co/FsEk3QQ0GJ https://t.co/ps8miAupBs
@Quirinale https://t.co/aPfy06pfgp riducendo di oltre 20 anni l'aspettativa di vita dopo la vaccinazione inutile come dimostra il lavoro di Cleveland, passate con nonchalance sulle balle climatiche senza alcun ragionamento sul perché dopo le punture i giov
@dttpeople @SolarisIV @TheOmniLiberal Here is the link to the actual study that was referenced in the video: https://t.co/r5G5FX5qLI
@Weedram5 @thehealthb0t The link is right at the beginning. Did you read the article? https://t.co/poeAfYB874
@Njorgensen92 @thehealthb0t The link is right there. https://t.co/poeAfYB874
Men Who Receive The Covid Vaccine Will Tragically Suffer A 24 Year Loss In Their Life https://t.co/3tbnKH5y6Y https://t.co/i3qXnP9tls
@abbyobenchain @sciqst @sciam And you bring ignorance. https://t.co/6XwlglYaUP https://t.co/5zJciHMpT8 https://t.co/EWDZHWZ2mI https://t.co/IjwOXl9Kye Keep up.
@elisaperego78 2/2 link to study https://t.co/WdLsn5Pf2f
@Twiligh21059926 @sjs856 And if you actually have valid data he just refuses to respond; I've been dropping the Cleveland Clinic employee conducted "increase in reinfections in the vaccinated" study because he can't refute it... https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E
@StanziAck @unhealthytruth @taheen74 A favorite right wing talking point. But the study does not support the conclusion that the vaccine increases COVID illness. https://t.co/kDQRWHPzxD https://t.co/6o0w5VtHer
@DrPaulOffit 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependi
@AntonioCunha79 @ruireisbarros "Bateu as botas pq as pessoas batem as botas." Principalmente quem confiou no governo e tomou varias doses dum produto sem estudos a longo prazo. As pessoas que tomaram a injecção são as mais susceptíveis de morrer de covid.
@beccyjanehealey 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dep
@jonathanstea https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E So then the staff of the Cleveland Clinic doesn't count? I was already under orders not to get it from Epileptology, increased risk of reinfection definitely isn't going to change my mind about it (had it late Delta-ea
RT @djlange: "I had (covid) 4 times, 3 times after I was vaccinated, which was bizarre" ~ Peter Andre Some scientists believe the 'vaccine…
RT @SenseReceptor: @KanekoaTheGreat @elonmusk Yes, essentially zero risk. Ioannidis IFR study: https://t.co/bd8N5NxZHh The injections also…
@WearAFeckinMask @timspector Only 30%!! "Summary: Among 51011 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster was 30% effective in preventing infection, during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were
@Meghanduggan1 @DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing inf
@DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependin
@KristalPooler @LuckyLuna07 @DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in p
@LuckyLuna07 @DrEricDing 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infec
@So76971019 @Philou13 @xazalbert @IHU_Marseille @raoult_didier Et pour vous , va falloir plus simple : cette étude est publiée [ Now published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad209 ]https://t.co/rx8XlCbLCl
@catlawfin @BorgesZahir @pmonroe79 @AP Compromised like "more susceptible to reinfection?"
RT @eliebre83: @SudRadio @SabrinaRoubache @raoult_didier Et revoir cette étude du plus grand complexe de soins des USA faite sur 50000 emp…
@SudRadio @SabrinaRoubache @raoult_didier Et revoir cette étude du plus grand complexe de soins des USA faite sur 50000 employés de leurs structures https://t.co/rx8XlCbLCl
@era1521 @NicotineLozeng @JohntheLyricist @RMarsh991 @Simon106229076 @HeidiPa22668162 A triumph for medical science at the cost of the human immune system? Rule 1: Do no harm
@DrJBhattacharya @CDCDirector 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing
@CDCDirector 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic studied 51,011 employees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” bivalent COVID-19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection dependi
@ManifestWestony @ScholerinED @CDCgov Wes, this guy is a clown don't waste your time. But if you need some sources for other people who pose as academics grab any of these links https://t.co/kAAd1Ztmao
@jfrketich @GrantRants @TheSpec Thank you for interesting article. You may want to update re covid vaccine efficacy https://t.co/QG5DXHPzCv
@DanielBenincas2 @MannelloStephen @MurielBlaivePhD my argument is that if you have an equal viral load (re: Fauci) https://t.co/ht0bJrxvWW and a vax that *increases infection risk https://t.co/NcriN4VBGp How in the hell can you presume mRNA helps the l
@KLVeritas https://t.co/eKYwGf4aiV More doses = more infections... They know this. They know WE know. https://t.co/XxIEXtsR72
RT @statonomic: @AnnaSova17 @HeyNurseKat @jonathanstea Anna - ive taken the time to read the other replies which thoroughly addressed all y…
@AnnaSova17 @HeyNurseKat @jonathanstea Anna - ive taken the time to read the other replies which thoroughly addressed all your questions. None of which you replied to in a serious manner as you said you would. This is called 'bad faith' That said -
@AnnaSova17 @digitaldraco @Noellenarwhal @redherringdraws Anna - ive taken the time to read the other replies which thoroughly addressed all your questions. None of which you replied to in a serious manner as you said you would. This is called 'bad faith
@MakisMD I guess she doesn't know that according to a very large Cleveland Clinic study, the more jabs you get, the more likely you are to get COVID. https://t.co/SrnhKJe016 https://t.co/h2cDPe5Auq
@yeahnaa333 @JeromeAdamsMD They’re also more likely to be 💉 Cleveland Clinic 51,011 employees🚨 “higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting C19” bivalent C19 vaccine was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infect
子宮頸がんにかかった人の HPVワクチン接種履歴を調査結果を 公表してほしい コロナは ワクチンを打てば打つほど かかる という結果 https://t.co/4L3SdFsScc https://t.co/hf6chCEg85
@Firefly51303257 Eigentlich schon seit Dezember 2022 bekannt und belegt: https://t.co/RgAvpdIG0I
@JaclynMcCosker 12/22 Cleveland Clinic 51Kemployees🚨 “The higher the number of vaccines previously received,thehigherthe risk of contracting C19” bivalent C19 was 29% 20% 4% effective in preventing infection depending on VOC https://t.co/EUHXqWPrVU ht
@beames_susanne @FiveTimesAugust Please check this: "The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19." https://
RT @CartlandDavid: Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine | medRxiv https://t.co/DwOBZ4CRMW
@ErikCumps @ClareCraigPath Quite the reverse, Erik. Clare is one of the few honest brokers out there. But, regardless, I don't accept anything without a pinch of salt. No comfort zones here. I recommend you join me. Or are you on the payroll to spread mi
RT @CartlandDavid: Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine | medRxiv https://t.co/DwOBZ4CRMW
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine | medRxiv https://t.co/DwOBZ4CRMW
@hessenjunge76 @pisocolins @unbiasedscipod @turquoiselau This is not what one calls "lowering risk" among this cohort of 55000 working age people, normalized for testing frequency Au contraire https://t.co/CHUfQ4Hghm https://t.co/QFlPS8YzG3
@turquoiselau @hessenjunge76 @unbiasedscipod Nah, you fell for Pfizer sponsored and government propaganda. https://t.co/2D2SDzVS1B
@ElbogenTiffany @doritmi @jill_shank @gorskon More jabs=more infections https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E
@jennydemaria @doritmi @jill_shank @gorskon https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E More jabs=more infections according to Cleveland Clinic...
@Gradysgrandson @stkirsch They make you MORE likely to get it, and multiple times too (due to narrow vs broad spectrum antibodies from actual infection once.) https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E
@NSenseBugBounty @stkirsch How about studies already out of peer review showing that you are MORE likely to get Covid+multiple infections the more jabs you took? https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E
@jlemay78 @stkirsch https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E the shots make you MORE susceptible to reinfections; that's called INCREASING rather than decreasing transmission😎
@JimBowersclimb @stkirsch https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E Newer studies show that they make you MORE susceptible to reinfections than unjabbed folks; that's called INCREASING transmission (not decreasing it.)
@BulletWilliam_ @stkirsch https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E Peer reviewed study that shows you are MORE SUSCEPTIBLE to get Covid multiple times the more shots you took; AND it's from workers licensed to practice medicine (not random patients with no formal medical t
@Mickey_____01 @444XXXXXXX444 @stkirsch https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E Or I could Link to an already peer reviewed study that shows you are more likely to GET Covid infections AND multiple times from those "safe and effective" shots... But Cleveland clinic is ful
@damiensrepair @stkirsch https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E No the data shows the more jabs the more susceptible to reinfections/multiple infections you are (per Cleveland Clinic, and yes it has already cleared peer review too.)
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@adoll_33 @IanCopeland5 @Censored4sure Yeah he's yet to refute the study saying that the shots make you MORE susceptible to reinfections (I've retweeted it for like a week now.) https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E
@Checkmate7518 @pjavidan @IanCopeland5 @Censored4sure https://t.co/ezvfc4fi9E This cleared peer review already; the vaccines literally make you MORE susceptible to reinfections than not getting them do according to Cleveland Clinic
@pjavidan @LauraMiers Especially when vaxxed multiple times (I waited until it cleared peer review first😉)
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@morenol_1990 Yes because that’s how things are written for fools like yourself. Search the data yourself. Here is the actual Cleveland clinic white paper study. Happy reading 🤣 https://t.co/hXLWrplWQK https://t.co/seZDYNjXfZ
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@RolandSB13 @deissler Cleveland Studie: Häufigkeit von CovidInfektionen steigt in Abhängigkeit von der Anzahl der bereits erhaltenen Injektionen. „Wirksamkeit“ des bivalenten Boosters liegt bei 30%. https://t.co/ovqWP1dpwZ
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @dockaurG: New Cleveland Clinic study of 51,011 healthcare workers: graph depicting “cumulative incidence of Covid-19 infection for subj…
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @dockaurG: New Cleveland Clinic study of 51,011 healthcare workers: graph depicting “cumulative incidence of Covid-19 infection for subj…
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@salvin_frank @RInserts @IanCopeland5 The science has changed since the early studies; and Pfizer literally admitted that they never tested for reduced transmission before giving them to people.