Yep -- The more shots you get, the higher your risk of infection. That's what's known in medicine as "negative efficacy" -- And pretty much the definition of "major fail". #FactsNotFear #RightSideOfHistory
@bdelahorne @PalleyKara @KathyMac4me @DrKellyVictory Major Fail 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% htt
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@Creativologist @Zuxs13 @lioncheetahfox @DrAcula987 @AblemanAdam @_PA_KAG_girl @anti_disease @TheDrJon How does that dispute what I said? Your evidence is an unsourced screenshot from 2021. Here is a peer reviewed study showing that the vaccines do not wor
@KashPrime @Ruffell78 Cleveland Clinic employee data is a smoking gun: "The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting
@redheadlass1402 @Notaspud_ @MakisMD Just read it for yourself. https://t.co/WONTqrw1eg
@jessica_jnd9 @thisuserismad @RogerSeheult In this Cleveland Clinic study, the incidence of covid was lowest in those who received NO doses, and increased with each dose. https://t.co/WKRZOR787k https://t.co/lydsl1bdpy
@redback81 @trollhuntersJM @The_Real_Ref @ing_xxxxxx @zambry77 @istat_it Lo studio è pubblicato con reviewed Aggiorna la velina. https://t.co/f45mApbqFK
@surinobaasan @H_I_1126 またそんな嘘をついてる、、、クリーブランドクリニックの調査の論文は免疫力の低下の作用機序を調査したものでは無く、論文は未接種者の方が感染に対する危機を回避にようとする傾向がある事を示唆している。 https://t.co/nGJ8R9X16X
RT @Randy64_fr: @AlainB5 Un deuxième avis Docteur Pelloux ? 🤔⤵️ https://t.co/4sr465EJns
@nonblankslate This was the most recent, but lemme go find my old thread... https://t.co/TC9Km1VSsq
RT @jamesdailyUSA: @hepasNmasks @melissa_zegar @ASlavitt @CDCDirector 4% effective vs XBB: "Estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 29%, 2…
@rt7683 @jason_willz1 @Redredred80 @SenatorRennick Cleveland Clinic disagrees: https://t.co/X7PZ08fmXw Earlier Iceland does, too: https://t.co/tz9hDLBgnU
@Dontsweatthesm5 @SKGandhiMD That's one reason why it's dangerous to get these covid injections - since the more shots you get, the more often you get covid. https://t.co/08lxcTBHpq
@SecBecerra @HHSGov @aafp It's impossible right now stay up to date because the vaccines themselves are not up to date! Down to 4% efffectiveness vs XBB. https://t.co/9GaDXQQWjq No excuse for waiting until fall to roll them out. Should be updated as new va
Vaccination alone was never a substitute for layered protection including masks/respirators, clean air, remote work, etc. Now vaccine effectiveness is down to 4%. New boosters won't even be available to those under 65 in the UK, and the USA is playing game
Um...4% effective? that really sucks. Wear a mask indoors, I will.
@CiViX The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19. https://t.co/tE6QV6Z2lP https://t.co/pm4czgx1tv https:/
RT @dockaurG: Large Cleveland Clinic study is now peer-reviewed & published. Findings all same. "Risk of Covid varied by the # of Covid va…
@hepasNmasks @melissa_zegar @ASlavitt @CDCDirector 4% effective vs XBB: "Estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 29%, 20%, and 4% (95% C.I., -12%-18%), during the BA.4/5, BQ, and XBB dominant phases, respectively" https://t.co/m5OhLXtzQC
@RyuichiYoneyama >なまじ自分の知性に自身のある人は、自分の選択の誤りを認められないからなのかなと、思います。 米山様も同様だと思います。 我が身を振り返りましょう。 https://t.co/isZBCe9W0E
@WoodG252000 Did you seek the research from Cleveland Clinic? It was very thought provoking for me. A 50,000 person cohort. Please read past the abstract and conclusions. Their methodology was sound, and they came away with something that surprised them.
@Sorry_ImNotSrry @Diesel60250598 @gravybish @DrWinterhorn https://t.co/gXT8AsylaA From the study "The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2)."
@Awithonelison @TheDrJon @Amir9999 Here’s the study, please let me know your thoughts on this data https://t.co/so0Tgk4l03
@TheDrJon @Awithonelison @Amir9999 What does the study say Dr. Jon, enlighten us please! https://t.co/so0Tgk4l03
@Lidski_Popov @SJ_23US @KyAngel72 @AlexBerenson "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received." Also bivalent "effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB li
@ShaIsGood @MalloChloe @nathmalfait @MartinZ_uncut @EricBillyFR @FlorianLemaitr5 Quel vaccin? Les injections géniques expérimentales faussement appelées "vaccins anti-Covid"? Vous plaisantez j'espère https://t.co/7UkQz4qvGI
@Noah10291105 @Mina02999247 コロナワクチン。 接種すればするほど、感染しやすくなるそうです。 参考、論文中、図2 https://t.co/5RjyuyU7BL 長期副反応もさることながら、医療関係者は逆にワクチン接種しない方が良いのでは? あ、一般のかたも。
@NJDeptofHealth Studies show the more you boost your chances of contracting COVID increase https://t.co/RDUg6H3NQn
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
LIES LIES LIES ! The more you boost your chances increase in contracting COVID. @NJDeptofHealth PHILTH @GovMurphy USELESS @NewJerseyOAG @njcourts https://t.co/EjE9PbCZer
@NJDeptofHealth Studies show the more you vaccinate your chances of contracting Covid increase. https://t.co/EjE9PbCZer
@dophe1 @heterodoksno The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19 (Figure 2). https://t.co/CM2t1RkU6I http
@Meagain10411919 @ticklemepfizer1 @TheDrJon This data suggests that the vaccines may *increase* Covid infections. Now show me the data that shows how well they work: https://t.co/so0Tgk4l03 https://t.co/qm2uxCmian
RT @tonylinfreedom: From peer-reviewed Cleveland Clinic Study, it clearly shows more vax shots = more Covid. Most likely these new variants…
RT @tonylinfreedom: From peer-reviewed Cleveland Clinic Study, it clearly shows more vax shots = more Covid. Most likely these new variants…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
From peer-reviewed Cleveland Clinic Study, it clearly shows more vax shots = more Covid. Most likely these new variants are mutating from vaxxed people. This is a pandemic of Vaxxed and it's not over yet. https://t.co/66QtBTSWFG https://t.co/0VfBhfOH9R
@ppikorokei @kitazatosatuki ワクチンは感染を促進しますよ。機序的にもバックブースト?するから感染を促進しますよ。理論とリアルで合致してます。国立感染研すらはっきり免疫の刷り込みやバックブーストという言葉を使って感染促進する機序を遠回しにわかりにくく言ってます。 https://t.co/C1V1nHaxFn
@tsh521866ksh @sazae_tabetai リアルワールドでは打てば打つほど感染すると言われてます。 https://t.co/C1V1nHaxFn
@Volo0Cfpl @yappakarauri ワクチンには感染促進効果があると言われてますけどね。 https://t.co/C1V1nHaxFn
@MakkakeShakkake @ReedRothchild12 @BNOFeed We’re tired of this - you can’t and won’t believe it. You’ll never ever announce, “gUeSs dA uNedUcAtEd tRuMperZ wErE riGHt” We know you’ll never admit it - but stop saying there’s no evidence 🥴🤡
mRNAコロナワクチンは、コロナウイルスに対して逆効果、つまり打てば打つほど感染拡大する。 証拠は以下。 クリーブランドクリニックの接種回数ごとのデータや、世界で一番打ってる日本の接種開始からのデータを見れば一目瞭然。 https://t.co/yXQVWJJz5n https://t.co/StlI1SOVo1 https://t.co/NakPwpSOgY
Puede leer el estudio aquí: https://t.co/TfjCwYRtDW Entrevista completa: https://t.co/y79h0Wsejp https://t.co/BbYkqEF88H
@mamalovesjbiebs @kevinnbass Think it’s this one. https://t.co/4kVMd5muO4
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
@SHomburg @GMCBerlin1789 "3x 💉 und trotzdem infiziert, weil der Schutz nicht funktioniert" ODER Nicht "trotz[dem]", sondern WEGEN! > #kontraproduktiv! Weil mehrfache Spikung das Immunsystem schwächen, steigt mit jeder weiteren #Spikung💉 die Wahrschein
Whatever happened to this one?
@HarveyWall15 @MdBreathe @pfizer @CDCgov Gish Gallop this 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
Burada ilk baskısı, https://t.co/iZriU9aCGl sonra ikinci baskısı https://t.co/4wzNfhNGBG ve son olarak hâkem onayından geçerek "Bulaşıcı Hastalıklar Dergisi'nde https://t.co/zM8JIJcGdF yayınlanan
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
@draramadoss @drramadoss
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
@NelwonNoronha @goddeketal @David_Leavitt @elonmusk @IncogIntellect @Shane04488381 @Adrian271086ro @abzalphadog @cumulonimbus23 @illini3 @nemo_impune @edwin79 @PostMusk The virus *loves* the vaccine. "The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
RT @CartlandDavid: Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
Always worth a reshare…… https://t.co/HfTqmWJPoD https://t.co/VYsnNLNygR
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @TheChiefNerd: Dr. Drew & Dr. Kelly Victory on a New Study Showing Poor Efficacy in Bivalent Boosters “The efficacy of the [bivalent] b…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Bivalent booster fails against XBB Study from Cleveland clinic shows effectiveness of only 4% The failure was notab…
@airdronians @nationalpost True, initially, but lets not ignore all the other issues. Under Results says “Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccines”. The boosted are now more likely t
@FrenzDrone @stkirsch Lead author is right to question everything in article and fact checks about the correlation but this is the OPPOSITE direction of an expected healthy user bias. But I bet you see this happening to vaccinated people...reinfections. ht
@JoshWalkos @KazGurney @AlanBixter @rikirikiroo 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA
RT @nbreavington: Share the shit out of this folks !!!! https://t.co/CxE9ZwW1wy https://t.co/A6LEfetPRy
@Deiloh @benryanwriter Nope, I won't. You are giving bad advice. "The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA23yZ
@SUPirates @SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box
@SouthwesternU 12-19-2022 The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees 🚨 “the greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19” VE 30% https://t.co/0OKSjA2Box