RT @blanc0981: 🆘新型コロナワクチン「接種回数が多いほど感染しやすくなる」と言う五万人対象の研究。 1番感染しにくいのは1番下の黒いグラフの未接種者。横軸は経過日数 (重症化は防ぐが逆に感染しやすくなる可能性高い!前から言ってるけど!接種繰り返すほど!ADEやIg…
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
@SahabiaAli @fluidloading Hé ben on va les faire une par une alors. Commencerons par celle-là : https://t.co/J0a93wwhAd Elle ne parle même pas de la durée d'efficacité. Voilà sa conclusion ci-joint. Aucune trace de tes histoires de 0% après 6 moins. http
RT @gyan_chakshu: BOMBSHELL STUDY: “The risk of COVID-19 also increased …. with the number of vaccine doses previously received. Was alwa…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @BlakeMMurdoch: *Preprint.* Bivalent booster 4% effective vs. XBB infection. CI *-12% to 18%.* Obviously still providing some temporary…
50 BİN KİŞİ İLE YAPILAN COVİD AŞI ARAŞTIRMASI --1 DOZ AŞI OLANLARDA 1,7 KAT DAHA FAZLA --2 DOZ AŞI OLANLAR 2,4 KAT DAHA FAZLA --3 DOZ AŞI OLANLAR 3,1 KAT DAHA FAZLA --4 DOZ AŞI OLANLAR 3,8 KAT DAHA FAZLA COVID VAKASI GÖRÜLDÜ. Kaynak: (Cleveland Clinic) h
RT @BlakeMMurdoch: *Preprint.* Bivalent booster 4% effective vs. XBB infection. CI *-12% to 18%.* Obviously still providing some temporary…
@littletashibear @radofaletic @SynthIge @IanCopeland5 The difference between you and Ian is he at least gets paid for his Pfizer advocacy. Imagine defending a therapeutic that makes it more likely you'll get the disease it's intended to treat. https://t.
@maolesen @FreedomFulton @DaleEnright2 @stkirsch Nope “risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” https://t.
@Odieux_Vulgaire @fluidloading Aaahh .. j'ai bien dormi. https://t.co/92AWIVWlVh
RT @BagaiDr: https://t.co/aEEBTJUWON Among 51017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%). bivalent vac state was asso with⬇️risk of COV…
https://t.co/aEEBTJUWON Among 51017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%). bivalent vac state was asso with⬇️risk of COVID19 in BA.4/5 (HR, .71) & BQ dominant (HR, .80), but⬇️risk not in XBB (HR, .96). (VE) was 29%, 20%, 4% (95%) in BA.4/5, BQ, X
RT @gyan_chakshu: BOMBSHELL STUDY: “The risk of COVID-19 also increased …. with the number of vaccine doses previously received. Was alwa…
RT @gyan_chakshu: BOMBSHELL STUDY: “The risk of COVID-19 also increased …. with the number of vaccine doses previously received. Was alwa…
@provaxtexan @SpittinVenoms @slikrik2003 @ssps744444231 @MauroDias13 How are you unaware that studies are proving that to be true? https://t.co/ZHNmZJ3ELd
RT @ZombyWoof2022: Peer-reviewed Cleveland Clinic study shows negative vaccine efficacy, i.e., the risk of a COVID infection goes up with n…
BOMBSHELL STUDY: “The risk of COVID-19 also increased …. with the number of vaccine doses previously received. Was always obvious to the ones studying data, but this one is for the “peer reviewed” junkies. https://t.co/XLxc2d7FV5 https://t.co/alAL4xB0M
RT @PatientDay: @PeterHotez In reading all the data, listening to scientists its clear the best choice is a safe protein-based vaccine like…
@CTVNews I'll leave this right here .... https://t.co/G3cye4RNIJ
@PeterHotez In reading all the data, listening to scientists its clear the best choice is a safe protein-based vaccine like #novavax. Bivalents are a failure. https://t.co/5qzR3Mj1nN
@mccles68 @thdivewhisperer @mehdirhasan “Conspiracy theories” https://t.co/iWiKOMEIUQ https://t.co/TdfsEKRYz1
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @blanc0981: 🆘新型コロナワクチン「接種回数が多いほど感染しやすくなる」と言う五万人対象の研究。 1番感染しにくいのは1番下の黒いグラフの未接種者。横軸は経過日数 (重症化は防ぐが逆に感染しやすくなる可能性高い!前から言ってるけど!接種繰り返すほど!ADEやIg…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
RT @blanc0981: 🆘新型コロナワクチン「接種回数が多いほど感染しやすくなる」と言う五万人対象の研究。 1番感染しにくいのは1番下の黒いグラフの未接種者。横軸は経過日数 (重症化は防ぐが逆に感染しやすくなる可能性高い!前から言ってるけど!接種繰り返すほど!ADEやIg…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @findogg: @AlastairMcA30 It seems the multi jabbed fair worse than the 0 jabbed with regards to C19 infections. https://t.co/6CKM44K7XZ…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
RT @CartlandDavid: Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CR…
Please post your most narrative ‘game changing’ articles and studies in thread below. For example: https://t.co/DwOBZ4CRMW
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
@AlastairMcA30 It seems the multi jabbed fair worse than the 0 jabbed with regards to C19 infections. https://t.co/6CKM44K7XZ https://t.co/M4N1ssioRj
@AlastairMcA30 negative efficacy buddy https://t.co/lMwpuajdJy
@underearth100 @OrwellMs #MikaAaltola n rokotteilla huononnettu vastustuskyky ruokkii kausikoronaa, mutta tätä Mika ei tiedä, koska ei tiedä aiheesta oikeastaan mitään, vaikka kirjoitteleekin siitä lehtien sivuilla. https://t.co/ud4kbSz34d https://t.co/q6V
@ajschwabeMD Peer reviewed study published in Mar 2023: "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with ... the number of vaccine doses previously received." https://t.co/S5kviK35qU https://t.co/aV4f8dWChj
@RobertM72103719 @Shinimegami86 @Robert_Heitner8 @Resist_05 Have you read the study? "Conclusions - The bivalent COVID-19 vaccine given to working-aged adults afforded modest protection overall against COVID-19, while the virus strains dominant in the com
@newscomauHQ Duh! Peer reviewed study published in Mar 2023: "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with ... the number of vaccine doses previously received." https://t.co/S5kviK2xBm
@joaquinlife @KPSCALnews @CAPublicHealth @lapublichealth @SpeakUpAmerica_ @syderature @HKDetwiler @rockncasserole @SupJaniceHahn @GavinNewsom You can get covid through your eyes you geniuses. https://t.co/S5kviK35qU https://t.co/T8DjUjf3Dh
@Fredoux01 Yeah, same. I actually wrote an entire thread about this study bc so many people were misinterpreting the paper: https://t.co/LaK13Sh0Bl
RT @nbreavington: Share the shit out of this folks !!!! https://t.co/CxE9ZwW1wy https://t.co/A6LEfetPRy
@crimsonartist Boosted? Peer reviewed study published in Mar 2023: "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with ... the number of vaccine doses previously received." https://t.co/S5kviK2xBm https://t.co/1H8pJ9OzxR
@rebeccamillar83 Boosted? Peer reviewed study published in Mar 2023: "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with ... the number of vaccine doses previously received." https://t.co/S5kviK35qU
RT @epimeme: O número de reforços vacinais está diretamente correlacionado com o risco de ter COVID. 1 dose, risco aumenta 1.7 X de testar…
@jumpedsword @QLexPipiens Certamente https://t.co/RZJtwmT4UX Può interessarti questo anche, Cleveland Clinic, studio su 50.000 sanitari. https://t.co/nBsoIKZinO https://t.co/U5YEpQjEEg
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
@MaxieCricket @MikeDonio All SARS/MERS vax trials failed. So only laypeople need to see covid vax research. Doctors have to warn people covid vax will cause more infections and more hosp/ICU/death, *before* everyone is vaxed and *before* we get Cleveland
@mkeulemans Tijd dat je jouw huiswerk gaat doen https://t.co/oRKW1BoUCW https://t.co/k2NBibZfRh
@alxgagnon @gcomeaudotcom Pourquoi rejeter la thèse vaccin + infection? Cette étude et celle-ci montrent une combinaison avec un potentiel destructeur terrible. Pourtant personne n'en parle. https://t.co/jwUI37nGiS https://t.co/lWmfsrrQ2t
@mkeulemans Ik heb dit onderzoek al in januari aan je gestuurd. Nu pas gelezen?
@ChristianLGraus @TonyNikolic10 Less likely? Mate, injected people are more likely to become infected, & more so w/ each dose. U aren't protecting anyone, my friend, not even yourself. We've all been lied to. Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease
@newscomauHQ Well that makes sense. Peer reviewed study published in Mar 2023: "Risk of COVID-19 also increased with ... the number of vaccine doses previously received." https://t.co/S5kviK35qU
@maestro_hell @GuerquinThomas @CPorteu @raoult_didier Toutes les analyses, toutes les études arrivent à la conclusion efficacité négative du vaccin https://t.co/JF2GAzgiBG Effets secondaires à un niveau jamais égalé dans l'histoire de la pharmacologie. plu
@CountryBee2 @kary_cee @Mark_Butler_MP You can contracting covid through your eyes. Plus vaccination increases risk of contracting covid (peer reviewed study -See links to sources. Can we return to some rationality? https://t.co/S5kviK2xBm https://t.co/
@CountryBee2 @Mark_Butler_MP Are they boosting? Study published in Mar 2023 concludes that the risk of contracting covid increases according to the number of doses you have had. Wake up people!!! https://t.co/S5kviK2xBm https://t.co/7S0HGqwvv5
@CR_1257 @lisapease Here's a study he had cited before regarding the ineffectiveness of the covid vax. If you want to know more about his views on all vaccines listen to his pod https://t.co/OLL1JM84Vu as far as the article. the man has 28 cousins, 3 fam
RT @CTParent301: Peer reviewed study from Cleveland clinic. https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/GkNsc4mfjN
RT @CTParent301: Peer reviewed study from Cleveland clinic. https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/GkNsc4mfjN
RT @CTParent301: Peer review paper proves otherwise. Never forget the idiotic Connecticut media supporting this agenda https://t.co/oQWGIb…
RT @CTParent301: Peer review paper proves otherwise. Never forget the idiotic Connecticut media supporting this agenda https://t.co/oQWGIb…
Peer review paper proves otherwise. Never forget the idiotic Connecticut media supporting this agenda https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/s79RwnUAlE
Two interested findings in this study 1 - The bivalent vaccine was 29% effective against contracting COVID-19. 2 - The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19. https://t.co/mC4MlqF7nt
RT @CTParent301: Peer reviewed study from Cleveland clinic. https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/GkNsc4mfjN
W O W ! The HIGHER the number of vaccines previously received, the HIGHER THE RISK of contracting COVID-19. Read all about it! https://t.co/YuWyStYYHN #csa1776 https://t.co/0L434Tc16o
Logical with our new up-to-date information. Yet @CTDems still push the jab. #vaccineinjuries @GovNedLamont @ctltribune @CTCentinal @CMBornFree @DrMGoldstein @lorionliberty
RT @CTParent301: Peer reviewed study from Cleveland clinic. https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/GkNsc4mfjN
Peer reviewed study from Cleveland clinic. https://t.co/oQWGIbXdsc https://t.co/GkNsc4mfjN
@PopforLife3 @MonicaGandhi9 Read Cleveland clinic study and references to other studies - this is also critical for colleges who still mandate boosts to respond to. @TracyBethHoeg https://t.co/MIZA9xr4Wg
@Zapwit @ProofofSteak911 @mlalex43 @kylenabecker @keithsklar You should read the study. That's not the conclusion. It tells us that which we already know. That the vaccine's efficacy wanes over time and with the subsequent strains. https://t.co/8e7dVDHqQE
@V_iswakker Dit is het onderzoek waar het in staat: https://t.co/g3i8VuE8KG
@radiosilvana @Tonydisante @RisatoNicola @matt7gh @DOCTORWHO71 @SecchiLuigi Bastava usare la funzione "cerca" + Cleveland ma hai preferito dimostrato ancora una volta il tuo letargo mentale. https://t.co/LdGCux68eu
RT @DaAcervo: Eficácia demonstrada pela vacina Bivalente para a cepa dominante circulante = -4% -quatro por cento -QUATRO POR CENTO!
RT @nbreavington: Share the shit out of this folks !!!! https://t.co/CxE9ZwW1wy https://t.co/A6LEfetPRy
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
RT @blanc0981: 🆘新型コロナワクチン「接種回数が多いほど感染しやすくなる」と言う五万人対象の研究。 1番感染しにくいのは1番下の黒いグラフの未接種者。横軸は経過日数 (重症化は防ぐが逆に感染しやすくなる可能性高い!前から言ってるけど!接種繰り返すほど!ADEやIg…
RT @higurashi_sato: @dalmatiano1 @shedwhitelines 接種者がブレイクスルー感染しているから、流行が何度も何度も繰り返されているわけです。 この論文が示唆することは身近な行動圏を観察した感想とものすごく一致すると思ってます。 http…
@dalmatiano1 @shedwhitelines 接種者がブレイクスルー感染しているから、流行が何度も何度も繰り返されているわけです。 この論文が示唆することは身近な行動圏を観察した感想とものすごく一致すると思ってます。 https://t.co/Mrw4TJj9pY
RT @DaAcervo: Eficácia demonstrada pela vacina Bivalente para a cepa dominante circulante = -4% -quatro por cento -QUATRO POR CENTO!
RT @DaAcervo: Eficácia demonstrada pela vacina Bivalente para a cepa dominante circulante = -4% -quatro por cento -QUATRO POR CENTO!
RT @blanc0981: これが査読通って掲載されたと言うことです。 この世界第二位の名門病院の論文に何か問題があるのか激推し派に「丁寧に」聞いてください。
https://t.co/GmcYitJ3AB “Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received. “
RT @DaAcervo: Eficácia demonstrada pela vacina Bivalente para a cepa dominante circulante = -4% -quatro por cento -QUATRO POR CENTO!